I object to being included in this image without a model release and demand that pixel be removed.
Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
41–50 of 419 posts
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#42I object to being included in this image without a model release and demand that pixel be removed.
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#43Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
(To be clear, the bright dots are stars [except the brightest one, in the lower right, is Venus I think], which makes this photo also a great demonstration that of course you can capture stars in space, you just have to expose properly!)
How do you know that they're stars? I believe they probably are stars as well (by visual comparison with a star chart, suitably rotated), but I've found no source for either claim. I did find multiple sources, including TFA, for the brightest being Venus.
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#45I was confused when I first saw this photo, as I don't think I've ever before seen a nightside, moonlit Earth, exposed so that it looks like the dayside at a first glance. I wonder how many casual viewers actually realize it's the night side. A nice demonstration of how moonlight is pretty much exactly like sunlight, just much much dimmer. In particular it has the same color, even though moonlight is often thought of…
I've also done video shoots with the newer mirrorless cameras and fast lenses shooting wide open again lit with nothing but the full moon. It again looks daylight on the image. As a bit of BTS, I recorded a video of the screen on the camera showing what it was seeing, and then pulled away and reframed to show essentially the same shot as the camera but it's just solid black. One of those videos was fun as we caught a bit of lens flaring from the moon, and you can actually see the details of the surface of the moon in the reflection. It was one of those things I just never considered before as flares coming from lights or the sun are just void of detail.
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
It explains why the image is so grainy. At first I was confused what that stripe to the left and the bottom was. But it’s just the window edge, and the noise isn’t stars.
Well one of them is obviously Venus. How did you determine the others weren't stars?
Zoom into this higher-resolution version: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e00019...
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
It explains why the image is so grainy. At first I was confused what that stripe to the left and the bottom was. But it’s just the window edge, and the noise isn’t stars.
(To be clear, the bright dots are stars [except the brightest one, in the lower right, is Venus I think], which makes this photo also a great demonstration that of course you can capture stars in space, you just have to expose properly!)
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#48Anyone find the full res version of this ? Nasa images page is useless. Government work.
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#49just the lowest hanging fruit that had been a second class citizen to the marvel of having an extraterrestrial angle to begin with
Re: Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well one of them is obviously Venus. How did you determine the others weren't stars?
I’m talking about the grainy noise over all the black parts (actually over the Earth disk as well), including beyond the window edge. The window edge itself looks like a denser and brighter stripe of stars. Zoom into this higher-resolution version: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e00019...