Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're arguing for government enforced de-anonymization while at the same time using an anonymous internet account :)
[flagged]
Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
41–50 of 226 posts
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#42Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are far as I can tell: people in the footage can collect damages as long as they're identifiable. Meaning that you could easily tell afterwards that the complainant is the one in the footage used. So a shot of a sports crowd is probably okay, though I imagine they have people sign off on some kind of T&C that covers that anyway. On the other hand walking-down-the-street footage you would need releases from those peop…
Assuming you mean in the United Stares, can you cite a specific law or court case to support your position? It occurs to me that the existence of paparazzi seems to be evidence against your position.
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#44Serious question: what will happen when people start getting implants? They’ll probably require some sort of off mode, but not sure how that would be enforced.
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#45It's why I use the classic camera-in-the-pen-in-the-shirt-pocket.
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#46My local county is currently in a dispute with the local bar association because they want to upgrade the courthouse security cameras and the sheriff wants to add audio capabilities. This includes to parts of the building just outside the courtroom that counsel will frequently use for brief asides with their clients (due to lack of other private rooms). The county seems to favor adding the microphones and pinky swear…
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#47I am not into Facebook/Meta nowadays, bet the technology is so lovely freaking magnificent... Back in the days, these were in Sci-Fi and dreams only... // https://www.ifixit.com/News/113543/theres-groundbreaking-wav...
It can be simultaneously true that smart glasses are a technological marvel and a privacy nightmare. It's also important to consider that while many places have some legal framework along the lines of "no reasonable expectation of privacy in public spaces," there's a social-psychological gap between that and the presumption of being constantly recorded, be it by other private individuals or governments. Because of th…
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/03/workers-report-watch...
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
sounds like an expensive way to get disqualified from jury duty.
The easiest way to get out of jury duty is to ask about jury nullification during voir dire. But the bigger thing is: why would you want to get disqualified from one of your biggest civic duties?
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#49Serious question: what will happen when people start getting implants? They’ll probably require some sort of off mode, but not sure how that would be enforced.
Re: Philly courts will ban all smart eyeglasses starting next week
#50I am not into Facebook/Meta nowadays, bet the technology is so lovely freaking magnificent... Back in the days, these were in Sci-Fi and dreams only... // https://www.ifixit.com/News/113543/theres-groundbreaking-wav...
Like Star Trek holodecks. They seem amazing at first, but only because the weirdest it ever got was a sweaty Lt. Barclay, a creepy Cmdr. LaForge, and a safe-for-TV sleazeball named Quark.
In reality, if you could "jack in" to a self-controlled Matrix, or walk onto a holodeck and make anything you wanted feel real, it would be 24/7, 100% the unhealthiest invention since the nuclear weapon.