Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right now they are building the Signature series cars. These are the first 1000 cars. The reservations for these cars involved a $40k payment up front, in some cases up to 3 years ago. General production cars only required a $5k payment up front. As a result, they are only capturing ~$50k per car, versus ~$85k once GP cars start rolling off the line. In addition, they've been ramping up production (they're roughly ha…
> As a result, they are only capturing ~$50k per car, versus ~$85k once GP cars start rolling off the line. That is not how GAAP accounting works. You record revenue when you finish building the car and it leaves the factory gate, not when you accept a deposit.
Tesla reports great Q3 results, expects to be cash flow positive by Q4
41–42 of 42 posts
Re: Tesla reports great Q3 results, expects to be cash flow positive by Q4
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is structural favoritism, if not nepotism, in the federal system. The byzantine bidding process, requirements, etc. mean only either very large companies or very specialized companies tend to go for direct government contracts. Plus, even in cases where they are initially assigned fairly, they become a prime contractor and can be gatekeepers on every other aspect of the system. Even if their decisions are then…
I used to work for a smallish company that works on DOD contracts. It's really not that bad. We did most of it in-house. I doubt it's worse appreciably worse than dealing with any big faceless organization (try contracting with Wal-Mart or Boeing). Big organizations have transaction costs associated with them. That's kind of inevitable. But the question is whether eliminating a few billion here and there in transacti…