I said it before and I say it again: If openly bribing a crony gov to cancel your competitor is now the de-facto standard of making business in the US, I don't see how any rational investor could still see US companies as a secure investment. When the rule of law degrades into pay-to-play politics, the inevitable result is a mass exodus of both capital and top-tier talent. And to add to this quoting another commentat…
Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
41–50 of 319 posts
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#42Huh, and I thought conservatives were all about government staying our of the way of the private sector. Go figure...
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#43Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#44I would love to understand in more detail what kind of use cases we’re talking about. Is this about locating the right target for a sortie for example?
> I would love to understand in more detail what kind of use cases we’re talking about. The whole point is that the use-case does not matter; either you allow the government to do everything they want, either you don’t.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#45[flagged]
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I would love to understand in more detail what kind of use cases we’re talking about. The whole point is that the use-case does not matter; either you allow the government to do everything they want, either you don’t.
either you allow a democratically elected government to do everything they want that is legal, or you insert private corporate decision-making into every government decision which is untenable
More generally, are there any comparable contract requirements in the field of defense, for a company in the same position as Anthropic? I'm curious.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#47Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#48[flagged]
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#49Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#50First, I personally predict, for myself, Anthropic will bend soon and this will be history. The last I commented about LLMs I was ad hominem'd with "schizophrenic" and such. That's annoying but doesn't deter either my strange research or concerns, in this case, regarding the direction LLMs are heading. Of 4 frontier models, one is not yet connected to the DOD(or w). While such connections are not immediate evidence,…
I am having trouble understanding what you are saying. If you were more explicit I and other people would be able to respond and interact with your writing. As it stands, I am having trouble finding anything concrete to interact with.
I feel you may be onto something, but you're not saying, so I (and I imagine other people) can't see it.