Live data from Hacker News

YouTube as Storage

github.com

41–50 of 163 posts

Re: YouTube as Storage

#41
post #38
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, you just pay daily in worrying when, not if, youtube will terminate your account and delete your "videos".

I think it's just meant to be a fun experiment, not your next enterprise backup site

Stegonagraphic backup with crappy ai transmogrified reaction videos. Free backup for openclaw agents so they can take over the internet lol

Re: YouTube as Storage

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> That great commons that are the multi trillion dollar corporations that could buy multiple countries? Exactly which countries could they buy? Let me guess: you haven’t actually asked gemini

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole

You don’t have to go ballistic!

Re: YouTube as Storage

#43
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just make sure you have you have a bot network storing the information in with multiple accounts. Also with with enough parity bits (E.g. PAR2) to recover broken vids or removed accounts.

par2 is very limited. It only support 32k parts in total (or in reality that means in practice 16k parts of source and 16k parts of parity). Lets take 100GB of data (relatively large, but within realm of reason of what someone might want to protect), that means each part will be ~6MB in size. But you're thinking you also created 100GB of parity data (6MB*16384 parity parts) so you're well protected. You're wrong. Now…

what other tool do you recommend?

Re: YouTube as Storage

#44
post #3

Love this project, although I would never personally trust YT as Storage, since they can delete your channel/files whenever they want

Upload to other video sharing sites for redundancy. RAIVS!

Re: YouTube as Storage

#45
Thechnically cool, but ToS state: "Misuse of Service Restrictions - Purpose Restriction: The Service is intended for video viewing and sharing, not as a general-purpose, cloud-based file storage service." So they can rightfully delete your files.

Re: YouTube as Storage

#46
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I assume it's an economics issue. As long as they continue making money off the uploads to a higher extent than it costs for storage, it works out for them.

Do they make a profit nowadays

Likely yes, with a margin of perhaps 38%

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34268536

Re: YouTube as Storage

#47
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are right, but YouTube is also a massive repository of human cultural expression, whose true value is much more than the economic value it brings to Google.

Yes, but it's a classic story of what actually happened to the commons - they were fenced and sold to land "owners." Honestly, if you aren't taking full advantage within the constraints of the law of workarounds like this, you're basically losing money. Like not spending your entire per diem budget when on a business trip.

This seems like a narrow understanding of value.

Which do you think has more value to me? (a) I save some money by exploiting the storage loophole (b) The existence of a cultural repository of cat videos, animated mathematics explainers, long video essays continue to be available to (some parts of) humanity (for the near future).

Re: YouTube as Storage

#48
post #34
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just make sure you have you have a bot network storing the information in with multiple accounts. Also with with enough parity bits (E.g. PAR2) to recover broken vids or removed accounts.

Or.... backblaze B2

Plus restic or borg or similar. I tried natively pushing from truenas for a while and it's just slow and unreliable (particularly when it comes to trying to bus out active datasets) and rsync encryption is janky. Restic is built for this kind of archival task. You'll never get hit with surprise bills for storing billions of small files.

Re: YouTube as Storage

#50
post #44
post #3

Love this project, although I would never personally trust YT as Storage, since they can delete your channel/files whenever they want

Upload to other video sharing sites for redundancy. RAIVS!

Stop ruining the internet end exploiting free resources
Post reply on HN