Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right, you just pay daily in worrying when, not if, youtube will terminate your account and delete your "videos".
I think it's just meant to be a fun experiment, not your next enterprise backup site
YouTube as Storage
41–50 of 163 posts
Re: YouTube as Storage
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That great commons that are the multi trillion dollar corporations that could buy multiple countries? Exactly which countries could they buy? Let me guess: you haven’t actually asked gemini
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole
Re: YouTube as Storage
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just make sure you have you have a bot network storing the information in with multiple accounts. Also with with enough parity bits (E.g. PAR2) to recover broken vids or removed accounts.
par2 is very limited. It only support 32k parts in total (or in reality that means in practice 16k parts of source and 16k parts of parity). Lets take 100GB of data (relatively large, but within realm of reason of what someone might want to protect), that means each part will be ~6MB in size. But you're thinking you also created 100GB of parity data (6MB*16384 parity parts) so you're well protected. You're wrong. Now…
Re: YouTube as Storage
#44Love this project, although I would never personally trust YT as Storage, since they can delete your channel/files whenever they want
Re: YouTube as Storage
#45Re: YouTube as Storage
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume it's an economics issue. As long as they continue making money off the uploads to a higher extent than it costs for storage, it works out for them.
Do they make a profit nowadays
Re: YouTube as Storage
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are right, but YouTube is also a massive repository of human cultural expression, whose true value is much more than the economic value it brings to Google.
Yes, but it's a classic story of what actually happened to the commons - they were fenced and sold to land "owners." Honestly, if you aren't taking full advantage within the constraints of the law of workarounds like this, you're basically losing money. Like not spending your entire per diem budget when on a business trip.
Which do you think has more value to me? (a) I save some money by exploiting the storage loophole (b) The existence of a cultural repository of cat videos, animated mathematics explainers, long video essays continue to be available to (some parts of) humanity (for the near future).
Re: YouTube as Storage
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just make sure you have you have a bot network storing the information in with multiple accounts. Also with with enough parity bits (E.g. PAR2) to recover broken vids or removed accounts.
Or.... backblaze B2