Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code for Infrastructure

fluid.sh

41–50 of 190 posts

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#41
post #9

All these tools to build something, but nothing to build. I feel like I am part of a Pyramid Scheme where every product is about building something else, but nothing reaches the end user. Note: nothing against fluid.sh, I am struggling to figure out something to build.

When there’s a gold rush, sell shovels.

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#42
post #9

All these tools to build something, but nothing to build. I feel like I am part of a Pyramid Scheme where every product is about building something else, but nothing reaches the end user. Note: nothing against fluid.sh, I am struggling to figure out something to build.

I find myself building fun tools for myself and things that help with quality of life slightly, but I don’t need all this extra enterprise stuff for that. I actually find myself more likely to use something I built because I am proud of it, even if there is already something on the market that addresses my need.

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#43
post #6
post #2

Hey HN, My name is Collin and I'm working on fluid.sh ( https://fluid.sh ) the Claude Code for Infrastructure. What does that mean? Fluid is a terminal agent that do work on production infrastructure like VMs/K8s cluster/etc. by making sandbox clones of the infrastructure for AI agents to work on, allowing the agents to run commands, test connections, edit files, and then generate Infra-as-code like an Ansible Playbo…

So how is this different from deploying claude code on a VM and letting it run? You can sandbox it in any of the dozen ways already available. What’s the differentiator?

This allows the agent to make any changes in a production clone vs agents running on a production VM. For example, you wouldn't want claude editing crucial config on the chance it brings everything down vs letting it do in a cloned environment where it can test whatever.

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#44
post #9

All these tools to build something, but nothing to build. I feel like I am part of a Pyramid Scheme where every product is about building something else, but nothing reaches the end user. Note: nothing against fluid.sh, I am struggling to figure out something to build.

That is the problem with software developers with expertise in software, but no deep domain knowledge outside the CS world.

Pretty much. I’m working on a few things with several people and I’m now constrained by their ability to find stuff to build.

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#45

Clever solution. I think ops (like this) and observability will be pretty hot markets for a while soon. The code is quite cheap now, but actually running it and keeping it running still requires some amount of background. I've had a number of acquaintances ask me how they can get their vibe coded app available for others to use. I really like this idea. I do a lot of kubernetes ops with workloads I'm unfamiliar with…

Thanks! Kubernetes is the next infrastructure primitive that I want to support but I'm glad you like. If you have any questions or ideas, lmk!

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#46

Clever solution. I think ops (like this) and observability will be pretty hot markets for a while soon. The code is quite cheap now, but actually running it and keeping it running still requires some amount of background. I've had a number of acquaintances ask me how they can get their vibe coded app available for others to use. I really like this idea. I do a lot of kubernetes ops with workloads I'm unfamiliar with…

The real problem is just the volatility for the employees. Unless Board of Directors/Owners punish downtime, you risk a dark pattern of uptime just being a nice-to-have when I can just replace any expertise with the next kid out of college + Claude.

So you really need customers to react. And this isn't theoretical - people have already lost their jobs and there's really, really good people in the market available right now.

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many places have "dev", "test" "prod"... but IMHO you need "sandpit" as well. From an ops point of view as orgs get big enough, dev wraps around to being prod-like... in the sense that it has the property that there's going to be a lot of annoyed people whose time you're wasting if you break things. You can take the approach of having more guard rails and controls to stop people breaking things but personally I prefe…

Sandpit should be a personal (often local, if possible) dev environment. The reason people get mad about dev being broken for long periods of time is that they cannot use dev to test their changes if your code (that they depend on) is broken in dev for long periods of time.

Agreed on all points. Local loops are faster and safer wherever possible.

But particularly for devops / systems focused work, you lose too much "test fidelity" if you're not integrating against real services / cloud.

Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure

#50
post #16

So... I already tell Claude Code to do this. Just run kubectl for me please and figure out why my helm chart is broken. Scary? A little but it's doing great. Not entirely sure why a specialized tool is needed when the general purpose CLI is working.

Yeah, I'm telling it to use aws cli to spin up instances, configure them, start servers, read cw logs etc.
Post reply on HN