Earlier quoted context omitted.
I live in a place with no fiber and no 5G. Here’s your business case.
So a high latency connection that is also susceptible to atmospheric effects and run by a madman is okay? I am still on DSL because there is no fiber or 5g internet here yet* . And I live on the edge of an area with 500k people. DSL is good enough for 4k streaming video and anything else I need and costs me $65. Why on earth would I want to make things worse by using starlink? Of course, if I lived 50 miles from a ga…
My only other option here is a FWA connection that is 1/10th the speed, it’s even more subjected to weather and costs me the same. That is it.
There is no DSL good for anything. Say what you want about the man (which I’m definitely not a fan of at this point) but Starlink is solving a real issue for many people.