JPEG XL Test Page
41–50 of 170 posts
Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#42I think JPEG XL's naming was unfortunate. People want to associate new image formats with leanness, lightness, efficiency.
Actually, I remember when JPEG XL came out, and I just thought: cool, file that one away for when I have a really big image I need to display. Which turned out to be never.
Names have consequences.
Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#43Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#44Works with Waterfox on macOS but curiously not Firefox. I wonder if their search deal with Google included keeping the image.jxl.enabled setting off.
Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#45Works fine for me in Orion on both desktop and mobile ( https://orionbrowser.com ).
Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Considering "jpeg" has become the shorthand for "digital picture", it would be a shame not to capitalise on it.
I feel like "jpeg" has generally become a shorthand for "low quality compressed digital picture"
Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#47Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#48Are there any up-to-date WebKit browsers for Android? The best I could find was Lightning, but it hasn't been updated in years. Edit: I found A Lightning fork called Fulguris. It didn't work with the JPEG XL test image, but I really like the features and customizability. It's now my default browser on Android.
Re: JPEG XL Test Page
#49Works with Waterfox on macOS but curiously not Firefox. I wonder if their search deal with Google included keeping the image.jxl.enabled setting off.