Live data from Hacker News

Our approach to advertising

openai.com

41–50 of 252 posts

Re: Our approach to advertising

#43
I'm kind of surprised this didn't happen sooner.

From an ethical standpoint, I think it's .. murky. Not ads themselves, but because the AI is, at least partially, likely trained on data scraped from the web, which is then more or less regurgitated (in a personalized way) and then presented with ads that do not pay the original content creators. So it's kind of like, lets consume what other people created, repackage it, and then profit off of it.

Re: Our approach to advertising

#44
If you had told me in 2011, when I first started discussing artificial intelligence, that in 2026 a trillion dollar company would earnestly publish the statement “Our mission is to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity; our pursuit of advertising is always in support of that mission”, I would have tossed my laptop into the sea and taken up farming instead.

Re: Our approach to advertising

#45

>In the coming weeks, we’re also planning to start testing ads in the U.S. for the free and Go tiers They didn’t even start with free, already a paid subscription included.

Including advertising in a paid product should be punishable by public flogging.

Re: Our approach to advertising

#46
Yup. Enshittification, right on track.

(I continue to be shocked how many people—who should know better—are in denial that the entire "industry" of Generative AI is completely and utterly unsustainable and furthermore on a level of unsustainability we've never before seen in the history of computer technology.)

Re: Our approach to advertising

#49
I think Google has already shown that in the long run, people accept ads and prefer them to paying a subscription fee. If that weren’t true, then YouTube Premium would have double-digit % of youtube users and Kagi Search would be huge.
Post reply on HN