The law even demands that the data is machine readable.
The only real moat is your own, observational data.
41–48 of 48 posts
The law even demands that the data is machine readable.
The only real moat is your own, observational data.
What's annoying is that companies capture user data and then lock it into their platforms, transform it, and resell it. But it is really the user's data that they're selling back to us. I would like regulation here, you capture my data then I can pick who you must and must not share it with.
And they simply ignore your choices anyway.
[flagged]
Attention is the only moat. Companies always try to make it seem like data is valuable. Attention is valuable. With attention, you get the data for free. What they monetize is attention. Data is a small part to optimize the sale of ads but attention is the important commodity. Why else are celebrities so well paid?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
User attention to get user data? I feel like the the data to drive the really interesting capabilities (biological, chemical, material, etc, etc, etc) is not going to come in large part from end users.
It's the other way around. You gather user data so that you can better capture the user's attention. Attention is the valuable resource here: with attention you can shift opinions, alter behaviors, establish norms. Attention is influence.