OBS is a great solution if you're on a budget or doing very simple streams, but I really urge anybody who is serious about live streaming professional shows to check out vMix. It's an incredible piece of software that is versatile and packed full of so many features professional broadcasts need all baked in.
Agreed! I tried to make OBS work for a video podcast, and it was a very unpleasant experience. vMix has great features: built-in remote callers, audio buses, MIDI controller support, titles; just to name a few that I use. I love and use free software a lot, but vMix blows OBS out of the water for semi-professional video productions.
OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
41–50 of 50 posts
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#42If anyone is using/testing WebRTC I would love to hear how it is working for them :) I am hoping Simulcast makes a impact with smaller streamers/site operators. * Cheaper servers. More competition and I want to see people running their own servers. * Better video quality. Encoding from source is going to be better then transcoding. * No more bad servers. Send video to your audience and server isn't able to do modific…
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#43If anyone is using/testing WebRTC I would love to hear how it is working for them :) I am hoping Simulcast makes a impact with smaller streamers/site operators. * Cheaper servers. More competition and I want to see people running their own servers. * Better video quality. Encoding from source is going to be better then transcoding. * No more bad servers. Send video to your audience and server isn't able to do modific…
I've been waiting for the WHEP support PR to be merged so I can input video from a stream into OBS and mix it before outputting it again with WHIP. Or am I thinking about it wrong ?
I think the best way to do it today is via a Browser Source. It is hard to get people excited because it is already technically possible.
I will keep working on that PR!
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#44Does anyone use OBS to record Teams or Zoom meetings? If so, what is the best way to set it up? I wish their website had a getting started guide for this purpose but I haven't found one.
In OBS, add a new "Source". Which choice you use will depend on your operating system, but on macOS they're using the built-in APIs in the OS to do the captures. I think on Linux and Windows it's "Application Capture" or "Window Capture". Choose your Zoom meeting window. Mess with the size/position as you please, and hit record. The OOBE setup that OBS takes you through on first launch should choose reasonable settin…
Do you know if your setup is using the new CMIO APIs? Or did you need to set the `legacy-camera-plugins-without-sw-camera-indication` override?
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
OBS outputs WebRTC, so you can push directly into vdo ninja now. If you want more control over your video quality/capture it's nice to not have to use your browser. Trade off is its way harder to setup.
I'd never heard of vdo.ninja. It sounds like the base use case, according to their main page, is the opposite? Phone to webrtc: > In its simplest form, VDO.Ninja brings live video from a smartphone, tablet, or remote computer, directly into OBS Studio or other browser-enabled software. I really hope I'm processing what they're saying incorrectly but this sure sounds like they are doing a video encode for each peer, w…
It has uses for things like hosting video podcasts.
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#46If anyone is using/testing WebRTC I would love to hear how it is working for them :) I am hoping Simulcast makes a impact with smaller streamers/site operators. * Cheaper servers. More competition and I want to see people running their own servers. * Better video quality. Encoding from source is going to be better then transcoding. * No more bad servers. Send video to your audience and server isn't able to do modific…
We ended up just doing a discord screen share, which evaded all the tunnelling/transcoding/etc issues which made us give up on WebRTC.
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#47If anyone is using/testing WebRTC I would love to hear how it is working for them :) I am hoping Simulcast makes a impact with smaller streamers/site operators. * Cheaper servers. More competition and I want to see people running their own servers. * Better video quality. Encoding from source is going to be better then transcoding. * No more bad servers. Send video to your audience and server isn't able to do modific…
I am hoping this space improves, I wanted to cast video to watch some stuff with friends last year and the software to accomplish this now is both really heavy (does EVERY part of the process need to run http server?) and convoluted. We ended up just doing a discord screen share, which evaded all the tunnelling/transcoding/etc issues which made us give up on WebRTC.
Can you try Broadcast Box. If that is still too heavy, what could I do to make it better?
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
In OBS, add a new "Source". Which choice you use will depend on your operating system, but on macOS they're using the built-in APIs in the OS to do the captures. I think on Linux and Windows it's "Application Capture" or "Window Capture". Choose your Zoom meeting window. Mess with the size/position as you please, and hit record. The OOBE setup that OBS takes you through on first launch should choose reasonable settin…
I'd love to hear more about your setup. The last time I tried messing with virtual webcams on macOS, most of the OSS options were still using the deprecated DAL API, which stopped working in Sonoma (without setting a `system-override` from Recovery Mode). Do you know if your setup is using the new CMIO APIs? Or did you need to set the `legacy-camera-plugins-without-sw-camera-indication` override?
I am mostly broadcasting the desktop view of a second or third computer on my desk, plus slide decks, graphics, etc. I hate Zoom's clunky screen picker UI and never want to accidentally share plaintext secrets or PII to the attendees by choosing the wrong window or absentmindedly moving a window to a shared monitor or something, so I got around that by just using OBS as a switchboard, and never having production data on my test computers. One is hooked up to an Elgato Neo capture device over HDMI, the other when required over a BMD Intensity 4K on an eGPU dock. Slide decks are the only data from my presenter computer ever shared, but via a 'macOS Screen Capture' source. I have a few scenes with text only too for info/time stuff. It's great being able to slap some text over a scene, or have two computers up at once in a half-and-half arrangement. Plus plugin support (used to capture from the BMD from a PC tower and send the video to my presenter computer over NDI when an older elgarbo capture card shit the bed), audio and video filters/effects, goddamn shaders, sky's the limit since OBS is so extensible. I've done in person presenting and still used OBS to generate a fullscreen projector of the program output.
I also personally have always found the "presenter awkwardly clicking around through an un-played Powerpoint" to be really unprofessional. I can hide all of that messy stuff and not just a bunch of dead air.
Right now I'm working on getting an Adafruit Macropad to talk to an ESP32 over UART so I can build a wireless streamdeck that doesn't require any shitty bloated control software. The ESP32 would then send commands/get statuses from the Websockets server and send em back to the Macropad so it can update the screen. This would be impossible to do with Zoom since the app isn't scriptable (on macOS most AppKit UI can be automated with AppleScript) and they only engineer for the lowest-common-denominator use cases.
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am hoping this space improves, I wanted to cast video to watch some stuff with friends last year and the software to accomplish this now is both really heavy (does EVERY part of the process need to run http server?) and convoluted. We ended up just doing a discord screen share, which evaded all the tunnelling/transcoding/etc issues which made us give up on WebRTC.
What software did you try and use last year? Can you try Broadcast Box. If that is still too heavy, what could I do to make it better?
> If that is still too heavy, what could I do to make it better?
I haven't picked it up yet to see whether it's complex enough to really need it but it has the same pain point a few priors did--being yet another service which I must configure via the browser and so it has to run an entire frontend for doing that rather than being able to do config files.
Re: OBS Studio 32.1.0 Beta 1 available
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
What software did you try and use last year? Can you try Broadcast Box. If that is still too heavy, what could I do to make it better?
Around last year I was using some custom plugins for OBS, I haven't used Broadcast Box but I can pick it up to try sometime later. > If that is still too heavy, what could I do to make it better? I haven't picked it up yet to see whether it's complex enough to really need it but it has the same pain point a few priors did--being yet another service which I must configure via the browser and so it has to run an entire…
It is like RTMP where you can just do a URL to publish/watch. It does come with a frontend though.