Live data from Hacker News

The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

schmidtsciences.org

41–50 of 64 posts

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eric Schmidt is, in his own words, an arms dealer now and is driving the R&D of autonomous A.I. weapons.

For the vast majority of non pacifists, that is not a bad thing.

> For the vast majority of non pacifists, that is not a bad thing.

Speak for yourself. I'm a non-pacifist, and I think "autonomous A.I. weapons" are a nightmare.

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#43
post #5

The age of plausibly buying a legacy is gone, so these vanity projects inspire more cynicism than anything else.

I am not understanding how this is bad. Other than a guy made a bunch of money and is spending it how he wants. Or is that the whole reason?

> a guy made a bunch of money

Through the systemic abuse and exploitation of countless individuals' privacy and autonomy. The context is everything.

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#45
The level of negativity in these comments is surprising. We can certainly debate whether billionaires should exist at all, but given that they do, here’s one who’s putting his money towards advancing cutting edge science instead of buying a third mega yacht. I am strongly in favor.

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The planet will be just fine. It measures consequential time in many millions of years. You mean: support saving humanity.

I mean, yeah. When people way saving the planet they mean saving humanity. That's exactly it. A barren rock does no one no good. I don't get it why people hang onto this expression, it's as if you heard that George Carlin bit and now that's your anchor to reality.

It's not like the dinosaurs had a save the earth campaign. Yet, before humans the rock had life forms that died out while the rock itself continued being a viable planet supporting life. If humans die off, the planet will continue on with life continuing in new ways.

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#47
post #33

As you can see by the name of the thing, they are married

Not sure why that's relevant. But if that's interesting then it's probably also relevant that it's an open marriage. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-13439603/eric-...

Besides the quality of the source, that's been slightly overtaken by more recent events:

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-11-20/former-goo...

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#48

The level of negativity in these comments is surprising. We can certainly debate whether billionaires should exist at all, but given that they do, here’s one who’s putting his money towards advancing cutting edge science instead of buying a third mega yacht. I am strongly in favor.

Schmidt has done more damage than he ever will undo with his philanthropy.

And one yacht should be enough, especially if it is like this:

https://luxurylaunches.com/transport/eric-schmidt-and-his-wi...

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#49
post #5

The age of plausibly buying a legacy is gone, so these vanity projects inspire more cynicism than anything else.

I am not understanding how this is bad. Other than a guy made a bunch of money and is spending it how he wants. Or is that the whole reason?

The 'how' matters.

Re: The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Observatory System

#50

The level of negativity in these comments is surprising. We can certainly debate whether billionaires should exist at all, but given that they do, here’s one who’s putting his money towards advancing cutting edge science instead of buying a third mega yacht. I am strongly in favor.

> The level of negativity in these comments is surprising

Maybe not so surprising:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46512881 "65% of Hacker News posts have negative sentiment, and they outperform" (2026-01-06, 456 comments)

Post reply on HN