I was curious about the long-term stability of the cited HAKMEM sin/cos generator. I found an overview here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3111501 (EDIT: I'm still not sure about stability, apparently it is stable in exact arithmetic under certain conditions.) Coincidentally it is related to the Verlet integration video I posted last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46253592
Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
41–50 of 76 posts
Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Language is fluid. This is ok. There are many bad things about LLMs, but a benign shift in popular language usage isn't one of them.
I disagree. It's a sign of what is essentially cultural contamination by an LLM. There is something vaguely gross about it, like when people start repeating advertising slogans. It's a sign that someone spent enough money that they directly rewired our brains.
Culture contaminates.
Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. It's a sign of what is essentially cultural contamination by an LLM. There is something vaguely gross about it, like when people start repeating advertising slogans. It's a sign that someone spent enough money that they directly rewired our brains.
> like when people start repeating advertising slogans but without the craft of a good advertising slogan. So worse!
Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recommend getting started like the author did: simulation first, then FPGA. Honestly FPGA will take you very far. I always get a kick out of being able to design my own SoC. "Hmmm I need 9 separate I2C ports... Ok, copy block, paste paste paste..." Or if you have an operation in software that's taking forever you can write an accelerator for it
What are the best modern tools to get started with in simulation for those who have never dabbled before?
Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#45I'm tempted to put together an FPAA with Tiny Tapeout, but it likely won't fit in the allocated area.
Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#46Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recommend getting started like the author did: simulation first, then FPGA. Honestly FPGA will take you very far. I always get a kick out of being able to design my own SoC. "Hmmm I need 9 separate I2C ports... Ok, copy block, paste paste paste..." Or if you have an operation in software that's taking forever you can write an accelerator for it
What are the best modern tools to get started with in simulation for those who have never dabbled before?
Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#48Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recommend getting started like the author did: simulation first, then FPGA. Honestly FPGA will take you very far. I always get a kick out of being able to design my own SoC. "Hmmm I need 9 separate I2C ports... Ok, copy block, paste paste paste..." Or if you have an operation in software that's taking forever you can write an accelerator for it
What are the best modern tools to get started with in simulation for those who have never dabbled before?
Re: Pure Silicon Demo Coding: No CPU, No Memory, Just 4k Gates
#50Oh shit, this prompted me to check and turns out TinyTapeout is back to life! https://tinytapeout.com/