41–50 of 272 posts
In the image they showed for the new one, the mechanic was checking a dipstick...that was still in the vehicle. I really hope everyone is starting to get disillusioned with OpenAI. They're just charging you more and more for what? Shitty images that are easy to sniff out? In that case, I have a startup for you to invest in. Its a bridge-selling app.
Unlike Nano Banana it allows generating photos of children. Always fun to ask AI to imagine children of a couple but it's also kinda concerning that there might be terrible use cases.
I'm honestly surprised they're still on this post-Sora 2: let the consumer of the API determine their risk appetite. If a copyright holder comes knocking, "the API did it" isn't going to be a defense either way.
Nano Banana Pro is so good that any other attempt feels 1-2 generations behind.
Nano banana pro is almost as good as seedream 4.5!
(Realistically, Seedream 4 is the best at aesthetically pleasing generation, Nano Banana Pro is the best at realism and editing, and Seedream 4.5 is a very strong middleground between the two with great pricing)
gpt-image-1.5 feels like OpenAI doing the bare minimum to keep people from switching to Gemini every time they want an image.
Question: with copyright and authorship dead wrt AI, how do I make (at least) new content protected?
Anecdotal: I had a hobby of doing photos in quite rare style and lived in a place where you'd get quite a few pictures of. When I asked gpt to generate a picture of that are in that style, it returned highly modified, but recognizable copy of a photo I've published years ago.
Even from their own curated examples, this looks quite a bit worse than nano banan in terms of preserving consistency on image edits.
I didn't have a good experience with NB. I am half Indian. Immediately changes my face to a prototypical Indian man every time I use it. This tool is keeping my look the same.
Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?