Live data from Hacker News

The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

41–50 of 57 posts

Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)

#41

This article is very technical and difficult to read. Is there a TLDR?

Eat one small rock per day as important source of vitamins and minerals critical to digestive health.

2, they must all build up and grind together in your crop before expulsion for proper results.

Wait, we're talking about birds right?

Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)

#42

Do we need to be skeptical of NIH because of Trump? or they're still okay? Also, remember - don't take D on its own. Always with magnesium, or you get harmed by it, for all that it also does you good. Body is not built for raw D. Also also remember, D2 is a vitamin, D3 is a hormone.

If you're looking to build and maintain healthy vitamin D levels, D3 is generally the better supplement choice, according to health experts and studies. Consult your doctor to determine your needs and the best form for you, especially if you have a deficiency or dietary restrictions. -Google Gemini

I think it's important to clarify understandings for non-scientific/med community each time these types of technical discussions occur.

Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)

#44

In the US, you can get 50000 IU on Amazon, good enough for weekly supplementation if you're low (same as prescription strength).

I recall reading some research which indicated that daily dosage resulted in slightly better protections against cancer. Though better than not taking it at all.

I just got more 5000IU at Walmart which was a nice surprise. Normally I take two 2000IU tablets.

Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)

#47

In the US, you can get 50000 IU on Amazon, good enough for weekly supplementation if you're low (same as prescription strength).

I get gummies at 2000000000 IU and that's not even the final form of my vitamin

Also what's an IU. Apparently it's meant to normalize impact across vitamin D species of which there are multiple. Part of me can see the reasoning but it runs contrary to how much of medicine/pharma operates, generally in such form as either mg per time interval or mg/kg per time interval. It would be like taking the whole armada of blood pressure drugs and dictating their doses in mmHg instead of milligrams. If only things were so simple!

Re: The Big Vitamin D Mistake [pdf] (2017)

#49
post #8
post #6

Meanwhile, my daily 5000IU Vitamin D pills were recalled by some authority in Finland for “excessive dose”, and since it appears that a recall anywhere in the EU will apply to the whole EU, I was given a refund and presumably won’t be able to buy it again.

5kIU = 125 micrograms, that's a lot.

It’s crazy how many of these comments completely ignored TFA.
Post reply on HN