Live data from Hacker News

Nook Browser

browsewithnook.com

41–50 of 125 posts

Re: Nook Browser

#41

I see we're heading back to the days of MDI web browsers, slowly but surely. It's really strange to me how web browsers used to allow so much configuration (like the option to use MDI tab/window management or just generic tiling) but don't anymore. I've been hoping a browser comes out that is just Opera 8/9 but with the ability to browse the modern web so maybe with the advent of all these new browsers I should start…

[deleted]

Re: Nook Browser

#42

> When enabled, they provide helpful tools such as chat assistance, summaries, up-to-date web insights, and more. I find this sentence to be a little odd. Who are “they”?

The previous sentence introduces the subject.

Re: Nook Browser

#43

I see we're heading back to the days of MDI web browsers, slowly but surely. It's really strange to me how web browsers used to allow so much configuration (like the option to use MDI tab/window management or just generic tiling) but don't anymore. I've been hoping a browser comes out that is just Opera 8/9 but with the ability to browse the modern web so maybe with the advent of all these new browsers I should start…

To reply to a comment that was deleted by the time I finished writing:

"I've been experimenting with old UNIX systems recently and have come to somewhat similar conclusions. (Regarding software like window managers becoming more simplistic and some programs having to poorly attempt to pick up the slack themselves)

It feels like open source software projects shifted from making 'program' and instead tried to make "alternative version of windows program". Looking at these old systems I see all these options and intuitive ideas, even down the metaphors used to describe actions. Last time I used a modern UNIX desktop environment it felt like everything was just trying to be a simplistic Windows alternative instead of a good operating system."

Re: Nook Browser

#44
Looks like Arc, would love to migrate out of it after migration, but always worry about maintenance. Creating a browser is "easy", keeping it up to date is a lot of work, and many open-source browsers look semi-abandoned to me.

Re: Nook Browser

#45
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because both are trying to be response to the death of Browser Company's Arc. ( https://arc.net )

The browser designs look identical to Arc, yes, but the website of these two new “Arc responses” also look the same, down to the background color.

The only difference is zen is Firefox based while arc and nook are chromium based.

Re: Nook Browser

#46

Looks like Arc, would love to migrate out of it after migration, but always worry about maintenance. Creating a browser is "easy", keeping it up to date is a lot of work, and many open-source browsers look semi-abandoned to me.

Zen is actually solid these days. being a Firefox-based browser, it has its quirks, (i.e. Theo complained about gradient rendering or whatever, but who cares?) but it's still the best Arc-like we currently have.

plus, you get synchronization across desktop (Zen) and mobile (Firefox for iPhone/Android). since Google limited theirs only to official Chrome, this feature is basically exclusive to Firefox and forks, Arc Arc Search, and Chrome for desktop Chrome for mobile.

Re: Nook Browser

#47
post #38

the sidebar was the best feature in Arc imo. I gave zen a shot just because of that and it was not a great experience to be honest. First, migration was buggy, then the sidebar lacked some basic features like renaming the tabs even though it looked similar. Nook seems to follow in the same footsteps I just hope that they nail the sidebar like Arc. Tab management is a mess and this has so much potential. All the best…

modern Zen is a lot better than then :)

the only missing from the sidebar thing is Library as a central place to manage downloads, spaces, and history. and although the downloads window looks a bit unsexy, it's totally enough

Re: Nook Browser

#48

I see we're heading back to the days of MDI web browsers, slowly but surely. It's really strange to me how web browsers used to allow so much configuration (like the option to use MDI tab/window management or just generic tiling) but don't anymore. I've been hoping a browser comes out that is just Opera 8/9 but with the ability to browse the modern web so maybe with the advent of all these new browsers I should start…

killing xul was the worst decision after the australis redesign

Re: Nook Browser

#49
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An integrated experience. In the past I found that the vertical tab options in Firefox had the tabs duplicated across the side and the top, which I always found to be a subpar experience. Again, probably something you could accomplish with user.js and user.css but there's a good chance an update could break your modifications.

If you haven't tried firefox' vertical tabs recently, try it again. Firefox's default vertical tabs UI is quite nice now.

I found it too buggy in my usage, it just doesn't compare to the polish in Zen or the other forks. Better just to use the horizontal tabs IMO.

Re: Nook Browser

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The browser designs look identical to Arc, yes, but the website of these two new “Arc responses” also look the same, down to the background color.

The only difference is zen is Firefox based while arc and nook are chromium based.

According to their FAQ, Nook is WebKit-based.
Post reply on HN