Live data from Hacker News

Toolkit to help you get started with Spec-Driven Development

github.com

41–43 of 43 posts

Re: Toolkit to help you get started with Spec-Driven Development

#41
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would you be able to share any links that expand upon your recommended approach? It makes complete sense to me as a self-taught dev, and is what I've always done (most recently, an e2e test of a realtime cdc etl pipeline, checking for/logging and fixing various things along the way until I was getting the right final output). I rarely write unit tests. It would be good to read something more formal in support of what…

no, but i have a feeling i should write one because i keep running into this misunderstanding. it makes it really hard to recommend TDD when people believe they already know what it is but are doing it ass backwards.

I just remembered this essay from the creator of HTMX. My approach is very similar.

https://htmx.org/essays/codin-dirty/

Re: Toolkit to help you get started with Spec-Driven Development

#42

> Spec-Driven Development changes this: specifications become executable, directly generating working implementations rather than just guiding them. Reminds me of TDD bandwagon which was all the rage when I started programming. It took years to slowly die out and people realized how overhyped it really was. Nothing against AI, I love it as a tool, but this "you-don't-need-code" approach shows similar signs. Quick win…

Test-driven development… died out? Have I been living under a rock?

Re: Toolkit to help you get started with Spec-Driven Development

#43
post #40
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a bit confused by this. Codex does not appear to be one of the options?

>AI assistant to use: claude, gemini, copilot, cursor-agent, qwen, opencode, * codex* , windsurf, kilocode, auggie, roo, codebuddy, amp, or q https://github.com/github/spec-kit/tree/main?tab=readme-ov-f...

Thanks.
Post reply on HN