Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would you be able to share any links that expand upon your recommended approach? It makes complete sense to me as a self-taught dev, and is what I've always done (most recently, an e2e test of a realtime cdc etl pipeline, checking for/logging and fixing various things along the way until I was getting the right final output). I rarely write unit tests. It would be good to read something more formal in support of what…
no, but i have a feeling i should write one because i keep running into this misunderstanding. it makes it really hard to recommend TDD when people believe they already know what it is but are doing it ass backwards.
Toolkit to help you get started with Spec-Driven Development
41–43 of 43 posts
I just remembered this essay from the creator of HTMX. My approach is very similar.
Re: Toolkit to help you get started with Spec-Driven Development
#42> Spec-Driven Development changes this: specifications become executable, directly generating working implementations rather than just guiding them. Reminds me of TDD bandwagon which was all the rage when I started programming. It took years to slowly die out and people realized how overhyped it really was. Nothing against AI, I love it as a tool, but this "you-don't-need-code" approach shows similar signs. Quick win…
Test-driven development… died out? Have I been living under a rock?
Re: Toolkit to help you get started with Spec-Driven Development
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a bit confused by this. Codex does not appear to be one of the options?
>AI assistant to use: claude, gemini, copilot, cursor-agent, qwen, opencode, * codex* , windsurf, kilocode, auggie, roo, codebuddy, amp, or q https://github.com/github/spec-kit/tree/main?tab=readme-ov-f...
Thanks.