Earlier quoted context omitted.
Gervais Principle
The problem with reading that is that it is, I find, almost impossible to stop classifying people into sociopath, clueless or losers....
Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
41–50 of 128 posts
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#42Culture of importing cheaper labor that they can manipulate. The H1B program is broken and ripe for abuse.
> Culture of importing cheaper labor that they can manipulate. > The H1B program is broken and ripe for abuse. Offshoring is a much bigger problem. These abusive companies can "save" way more money by exporting the job than importing a worker to fill it, and pandemic-era changes have accelerated that.
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
The culture is "I want another yacht".
To be fair, I would like another yacht too. Especially considering my first yacht is really better described as a kayak.
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#44pip culture
uv pip install culture
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#45> “We are committed to operating like the world’s largest startup, and … that means removing layers.” I learned a long time ago that behaving like a startup is not a good thing, and I've specifically oriented my career towards working at companies that don't even want to pretend to imitate startup culture. I'm very happy in enterprise-land.
I have worked at both and... well they're just very different. It's mostly trade offs. What specifically for y'all?
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#46The culture was abysmal. Not because of layers, Andy, but because you decided to do all your announcements in secret on A to Z.
Cowardice.
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Culture of importing cheaper labor that they can manipulate. > The H1B program is broken and ripe for abuse. Offshoring is a much bigger problem. These abusive companies can "save" way more money by exporting the job than importing a worker to fill it, and pandemic-era changes have accelerated that.
I'm starting to think offshoring is better for America. Because house prices are unaffordable. Should a simple house really be $2 million ?
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#48> “We are committed to operating like the world’s largest startup, and … that means removing layers.” I learned a long time ago that behaving like a startup is not a good thing, and I've specifically oriented my career towards working at companies that don't even want to pretend to imitate startup culture. I'm very happy in enterprise-land.
It's hard to beat the authority and responsibility one personally has at a startup.
I want to (artificially perhaps) peg my projects to a smaller cohort of employees if it means the stress to them is worth it if they have the autonomy to ship stuff on their own accord, for a general feeling of having a successful and useful career.
Re: Amazon says it didn't cut people because of money. But because of 'culture'
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm starting to think offshoring is better for America. Because house prices are unaffordable. Should a simple house really be $2 million ?
Depends on its location and how many dual earner high income households want to buy it. There is no reason a specific lot should not be worth an arbitrary $x.