I must have used nano for years at this point, and I'm shocked to find out how customisable nano actually is! I tend to use micro[0] on most of my systems now just because it comes with really lovely defaults and keybindings that are a bit more familiar, but this might make me take a second look at nano in future. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io/
Before I used micro & ne I used nano, and configured the keybindings to work in the CUA style. I still have the dot files, didn't delete them, but they rarely get used anymore. I think they recently added Ctrl+S to save by default, even if unconfigured, woohoo.
Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
41–50 of 69 posts
Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#42I must have used nano for years at this point, and I'm shocked to find out how customisable nano actually is! I tend to use micro[0] on most of my systems now just because it comes with really lovely defaults and keybindings that are a bit more familiar, but this might make me take a second look at nano in future. [0] https://micro-editor.github.io/
Before I used micro & ne I used nano, and configured the keybindings to work in the CUA style. I still have the dot files, didn't delete them, but they rarely get used anymore. I think they recently added Ctrl+S to save by default, even if unconfigured, woohoo.
XOFF ignored, mumble mumble
Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#43Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#44Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would say that every tool has its good and bad. A tool is only as good as its ease of use and clarity of its documentation, imho.
Wouldn't that make vi(m) just about the worst tool to exist? There's a reason that the "how do I exit vim" jokes exist, it's because the UI is awful unless you already know how to use it.
Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Before I used micro & ne I used nano, and configured the keybindings to work in the CUA style. I still have the dot files, didn't delete them, but they rarely get used anymore. I think they recently added Ctrl+S to save by default, even if unconfigured, woohoo.
For CUA aficionados, I recommend dte[0]. It has replaced my nano usage quite a lot. [0]: https://craigbarnes.gitlab.io/dte/index.html
Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#47What would it take to have "vim-wiki" for nano (see also: FOAM, Obsidian)? I have always admired nano for how simple and easy to use it is, and would love to use it for wiki/obsidian-style note taking & linking...
Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#48My struggle is that I work on lots of systems, sometimes ephemeral/temporary systems. There is no easy way to "sync" customizations, so I adapt to defaults. Even basic things like how shell history is managed is very annoying to configure every single time. if only it was as simple as cloning your private github repo to ~/.config.
Most of the time, I can manage without, but every now and again I've needed to do some thing or other, and I've been grateful to have my own preferred setup rather than somebody else's.
Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#49Is it possible to apply some of the settings like autoindent or line numbers only when editing source code? In other words, does it have different modes like emacs?
Re: Customize Nano Text Editor (2022)
#50Is it possible to apply some of the settings like autoindent or line numbers only when editing source code? In other words, does it have different modes like emacs?