[flagged]
Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
41–50 of 63 posts
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#42Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#43It is the vendor supplying the website he is visiting that told him to do that.
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not well. "When Face Recognition Doesn’t Know Your Face Is a Face An estimated 100 million people live with facial differences. As face recognition tech becomes widespread, some say they’re getting blocked from accessing essential systems and services." https://www.wired.com/story/when-face-recognition-doesnt-kno... Posted to HN yesterday at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45667472 . No comments.
> Posted to HN yesterday [...] No comments. I wonder if that is partially because many (like myself) aren't subscribers and can't read the article.
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#45I wonder how it might affect people with medical conditions that make their faces look unusual. If the law only applies to pornography, most people in that situation might not want to go talk to a journalist about it.
The law does not mandate check via camera.
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#46[flagged]
What the actual fuck is up with this statement? Human faces are complex, there are so many different cultures and all kinds of complex body modifications (including facial tattoos) have a rich history going back thousands of years. Some shitty cobbled together AI not being able to recognize that is the real problem. Not the facial tattoos. And the injured smurf comment was completely uncalled for.
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#47[flagged]
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#48[flagged]
> "doesn't work on a man that looks more like an injured smurf than a human" What the actual fuck is up with this statement? Human faces are complex, there are so many different cultures and all kinds of complex body modifications (including facial tattoos) have a rich history going back thousands of years. Some shitty cobbled together AI not being able to recognize that is the real problem. Not the facial tattoos. A…
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#49The UK's Online Safety Act requires website owners to verify ages but it doesn't prescribe specific methods for doing so. It is the vendor supplying the website he is visiting that told him to do that.
Re: Britain's most tattooed man says UK's age check told him to "remove his face"
#50[flagged]
> "doesn't work on a man that looks more like an injured smurf than a human" What the actual fuck is up with this statement? Human faces are complex, there are so many different cultures and all kinds of complex body modifications (including facial tattoos) have a rich history going back thousands of years. Some shitty cobbled together AI not being able to recognize that is the real problem. Not the facial tattoos. A…
I believe anyone should be able to alter their appearance in any way they want, but if you choose to ink your skin to be more blue than skin-tone (linked articles have pictures without the Instagram filter that make the blue-ness much more clear, like https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/article34897342.ece/ALTERNATES/...), you should not be surprised when people and people-made programs think you're wearing a costume. This isn't just an AI program, according to the articles about him, he's had the same issues with real people at airports.
The core of the problem still remains the same; AI is not capable of reliably recognising people (kids used video game characters to bypass age verification), let alone determine their age reliably, and I believe most of the OSA should be abolished.