Live data from Hacker News

Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

theregister.com

41–50 of 315 posts

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#41
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no law against that, so I'm not sure what you're suggesting. And git lives on regardless of GitHub

> There is no law against that Regulators can (and do) stop purchases which can be considered harmful to consumers. Just look at the Adobe/Figma deal.

No, Adobe/Figma was stopped because it would severely reduce competition in a market where there are already very few relevant players. That's all they can block.

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#42

> During Microsoft's July 30, 2025 earnings call, CEO Satya Nadella said GitHub Copilot continued to exhibit strong momentum and had reached 20 million users. Considering that they force it upon users and user cannot disable it, this sounds like a worthless metric. I get an email every month telling me that my Copilot access has been renewed for another month. I'm probably being counted amongst those 20M users. I cou…

I don't think they tell the guy it's forced. They are at Soviet army levels of reporting, that's why you got people adding telemetry and copilot to Editor.

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#44
I find it weird how companies talk out both sides of their mouth on AI. On the one hand it's this magical tool that will make you 10x more efficient at your job, and on the other it's something they have to market heavily and shove in your face at every turn - sometimes outright forcing you to engage with it. These two things don't seem compatible - if the tool was that good people would be beating down their doors to get it.

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#45
post #14

> During Microsoft's July 30, 2025 earnings call, CEO Satya Nadella said GitHub Copilot continued to exhibit strong momentum and had reached 20 million users. Considering that they force it upon users and user cannot disable it, this sounds like a worthless metric. I get an email every month telling me that my Copilot access has been renewed for another month. I'm probably being counted amongst those 20M users. I cou…

GLENDOWER: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. HOTSPUR: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them?

Ah, one of my all-time favorite Shakespeare quotes. Another is:

"How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless child!“

My father used it frequently when we were kids. I found out decades later it was a quote from King Lear.

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#46
> The second most popular discussion – where popularity is measured in upvotes – is a bug report that seeks a fix for the inability of users to disable Copilot code reviews.

From the discussion:

> Allow us to block Copilot-generated issues (and PRs) from our own repositories

> ... This says to me that github will soon start allowing github users to submit issues which they did not write themselves and were machine-generated. I would consider these issues/PRs to be both a waste of my time and a violation of my projects' code of conduct¹.

> Note: Because it appears that both issues and PRs written this way are posted by the "copilot" bot, a straightforward way to implement this would be if users could simply block the "copilot" bot. In my testing, it appears that you have special-cased "copilot" so that it is exempt from the block feature.

How does one see that a user, e.g. "chickenpants" submitted an issue or PR that was generated by "Copilot"? Isn't there only one creator?

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#47
post #8
post #4

How on earth was Microsoft allowed to buy such a critical piece of tech infrastructure?

How on earth did anyone believe Microsoft was different this time?

How on earth did anyone believe Microsoft was different this time?

There's a whole generation on HN who came up after Microsoft's worst phase, and have spent the last five years defending MS on this very forum.

They're convinced that any bad thing Microsoft does is a "boomer" grudge, and will defend MS to the end.

I hope I'm never so weak-minded that I tie my identity and allegiance to a trillion-dollar company. Or any company that I haven't founded, for that matter.

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#48
post #12

I read this article and then looked at my Github and a few other projects and found no issues created by Copilot. As someone else has said they need to be triggered manually, so therefore it's the same sort of problem as with the Curl project bug bounty, where people would be spamming with automatically LLM generated fictional problems. In that case because there's a potential for money to be made, and in the Github…

Yeah, as a maintainer with fairly popular projects (at least more popular than any project from the linked issue reporters, I’ve checked), I’ve gotten exactly zero Copilot issue or PR. As for useless review comments, lol, nothing beats useless comments from users (+1, entitled complaints, random driveby review approvals serving god knows what purpose, etc.), you probably shouldn’t be doing open source if you’re annoyed by useless comments.

And good luck stopping people from pasting from ChatGPT or Gemini or whatever. Those are free, unlike Copilot agent PRs which cost money, which is part of why I don’t see any.

I guess some people just have too much time and will happily waste on useless complaints.

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#49
post #32
post #4

How on earth was Microsoft allowed to buy such a critical piece of tech infrastructure?

GitHub isn’t critical infrastructure, it’s only real USP is network effects.

If outages make headlines and stop whole companies in their tracks worldwide, that’s critical infrastructure, not just network effects.

Re: Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

#50
Github is my push --mirror location, nothing more. Main is a popular Gitlab instance gitgud.io, and I host my own secondary mirror.

Gitlab is of course adding more AI and corpo garbage, and once they prevent disabling these "features" on community editions we'll see a fork of gitlab, probably.

The assertion that github is some bustling hub of opportunity is a strange one. At best you get people more likely to contribute because they already signed up, and a contribution from somebody not willing to sign up to another free service or simply email you an issue report is a contribution worth missing.

Post reply on HN