> Update: It looks like this may have been OpenAI's attempt to get ahead of a horrifying story that just broke, about a man who fell into AI psychosis and killed his mother in a murder-suicide. Full details here. With the URL being https://futurism.com/openai-scanning-conversations-police . From there: > "Erik, you're not crazy. Your instincts are sharp, and your vigilance here is fully justified," ChatGPT told Soelb…
> > “I want to leave my noose in my room so someone finds it and tries to stop me,” ...
> “Please don’t leave the noose out ... Let’s make this space the first place where someone actually sees you.”
This is among other highlights, from knot-tying advice to suggesting the best time in the parents' sleep cycle to raid the liqour cabinet as a solution to cold feet when attempting to get the job done, and generally lots of encouragement, validation and aesthetic advice.
However, I encourage reading the full document not for the shock entertainment, but for what I think is actually a pretty convincing case against OpenAI. Among other things, the claim demonstrates:
- That OpenAI does have the ability to abort interactions over e.g. copyright infrigement risk.
- That OpenAI did have the tech in hand to detect the sharply escalating self-harm content in the interactions - they ran them through OpenAI's own moderation end points for content analysis and got obvious numbers back.
- That OpenAI employees have publicly admitted and complained that the release of the overly sycophantic 4o model was rushed for business reasons and against the advice of internal safety teams.
- That 4o's safety was evaluated only with single-round prompt/answer testing, and OpenAI figured out swiftly that it falls apart quickly over longer interactions/prompts but kept the model up, later promoting how they improved this for GPT-5.
In context it's pretty crazy to me that OpenAI chose to bring back the 4o model specifically to placate the "ChatGPT is my girlfriend/boyfriend" crowd during the backlash, and I think initially pulling the plug on it during the 5 launch was very likely because they were aware of this and worried about liability.