Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are we forgetting fox news, rush limbaugh...?
i don't think the ven diagram between people who watch tiktoks and rush limbaugh has much overlap. I think the republicans strategy towards social media platforms is extremely effective (sadly)
A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
41–50 of 80 posts
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is, they don't like normal people. They don't trust them or think their opinions have value, and they've made that clear over the last several years. It took a while, but the normal people have finally started to get it. It wasn't always that way. Democrats like Bill Clinton used to be able to go out and talk to normal people and make them feel like he liked them and sympathized with them. I remember when…
> There's not a single prominent Democrat whom normal people look at and feel like he or she cares about them. What about Bernie, AOC, Zohran? I think there are a few but probably none of the establishment ones.
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#43This seems like yet another a hilariously disastrous misstep on the part of the Democrats, dark money and restricted speech and red tape. Have they considered just, you know, talking to people on the internet? The way normal humans do? The way Trump has done with such wildly incredible success?
The problem is, they don't like normal people. They don't trust them or think their opinions have value, and they've made that clear over the last several years. It took a while, but the normal people have finally started to get it. It wasn't always that way. Democrats like Bill Clinton used to be able to go out and talk to normal people and make them feel like he liked them and sympathized with them. I remember when…
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
i don't think the ven diagram between people who watch tiktoks and rush limbaugh has much overlap. I think the republicans strategy towards social media platforms is extremely effective (sadly)
Or maybe a consolidated media industry is just not representative of what people actually believe.
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#45at this point i'm not mad the democrats are doing propaganda i'm just offended at how shit they are at it. The republicans brainwashed half the country and overturned the constitution with 4 podcast bros and a dream and the democrats are busy trying to kick their most popular members out of the party.
This isn't recent; we've been heading this way for decades, and not by accident.
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is, they don't like normal people. They don't trust them or think their opinions have value, and they've made that clear over the last several years. It took a while, but the normal people have finally started to get it. It wasn't always that way. Democrats like Bill Clinton used to be able to go out and talk to normal people and make them feel like he liked them and sympathized with them. I remember when…
> There's not a single prominent Democrat whom normal people look at and feel like he or she cares about them. What about Bernie, AOC, Zohran? I think there are a few but probably none of the establishment ones.
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or maybe a consolidated media industry is just not representative of what people actually believe.
well i believe media definitle affects what people believe, of course it only works to a limit, but i don't think a single person should own multiple media outlets. You gotta choose, you get 1 thing, that's it
That was a good idea. But we stopped.
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or maybe a consolidated media industry is just not representative of what people actually believe.
well i believe media definitle affects what people believe, of course it only works to a limit, but i don't think a single person should own multiple media outlets. You gotta choose, you get 1 thing, that's it
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
To suggest the right wing media ecosystem is "just talking to people on the Internet" is hilariously divorced from reality. https://apnews.com/article/russian-interference-presidential...
That just seems like an influence campaign. I expect every country to try to meddle in each other's politics, for their own gain. Also Tim Pool? Rubin? Those are small fries. Putin couldn't afford Joe Rogan or Ben Shapiro?
(edit: context) https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/maga-commentator-who...
Re: A dark money group is funding high-profile Democratic influencers
#50at this point i'm not mad the democrats are doing propaganda i'm just offended at how shit they are at it. The republicans brainwashed half the country and overturned the constitution with 4 podcast bros and a dream and the democrats are busy trying to kick their most popular members out of the party.
The current far-right effort started with the postwar "think tank" boom, and that crowd has been working (successfully) to bend policy and law so they can enable and guide the creation of massive right-wing propaganda networks since the 70s. Fox News, Sinclair Media, a handful of dominant AM radio and now podcast production & distribution networks, and so on. This isn't recent; we've been heading this way for decades…