Live data from Hacker News

Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Blockbuster Spending Spree

wsj.com

41–45 of 45 posts

Re: Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Blockbuster Spending Spree

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't think those employees and vendors' employees and/or vendors' shareholders paid taxes on their income, capital gains, and/or dividends?

I think they paid taxes and I think they are too low.

Based on the fact that Meta was able to spend $x money on developing VR?

Seems like pretty arbitrary and baseless reasoning to conclude taxes liabilities were too low.

Re: Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Blockbuster Spending Spree

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think they paid taxes and I think they are too low.

Based on the fact that Meta was able to spend $x money on developing VR? Seems like pretty arbitrary and baseless reasoning to conclude taxes liabilities were too low.

Just a sign that profits aren’t being sufficiently taxed if $40b are trivially available for a billionaires pet project.

Re: Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Blockbuster Spending Spree

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Based on the fact that Meta was able to spend $x money on developing VR? Seems like pretty arbitrary and baseless reasoning to conclude taxes liabilities were too low.

Just a sign that profits aren’t being sufficiently taxed if $40b are trivially available for a billionaires pet project.

If a business spends $40B to try to develop a new line if business, that is a business expense. If you are claiming that Meta’s R&D for virtual reality was not a legitimate business expense, but purely for Zuckerberg’s personal satisfaction, then good luck proving that.

Or are you arguing for a tax on revenue, instead of profit?

>are trivially available for a billionaires pet project.

What could this even mean? That it is trivial to become a majority owner of a business with enough cash flow to be able to spend $40B on R&D? If so, then you we live in different universes.

Re: Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Blockbuster Spending Spree

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just a sign that profits aren’t being sufficiently taxed if $40b are trivially available for a billionaires pet project.

If a business spends $40B to try to develop a new line if business, that is a business expense. If you are claiming that Meta’s R&D for virtual reality was not a legitimate business expense, but purely for Zuckerberg’s personal satisfaction, then good luck proving that. Or are you arguing for a tax on revenue, instead of profit? >are trivially available for a billionaires pet project. What could this even mean? That…

Not my opinion on it being a $40b plaything. That came straight from swe from meta who complain about it in these terms here on HN. It just tells me that their tax burden is too low. The fact that zuck is a billionaire means it’s also too low.

Re: Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Blockbuster Spending Spree

#45
post #27

There has to be adverse selection here from the amount of money being offered right? Like ok, very few people could turn it down, but it's not going to result in a motivated team. I am imagining all these overpaid founders etc just sitting in a room like reality show contestants. Trying to make smalltalk, brainstorm jamming for months, not really producing much because... who cares, they have unbelievable money and t…

I would imagine there is some sort of incentive structure for the megamillions being offered by meta to these people not just throwing all of the money at them upfront. Payout structed around meeting measurable goals not just show up and collect fuck you money. Or maybe it is silcon valley redux and they will set on the roof with big head what do I know.
Post reply on HN