Live data from Hacker News

Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

amirsharif.com

41–50 of 143 posts

Re: Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

#41
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This might defeat the purpose of MFA but I use an authenticator like Ente that works on the desktop and syncs to and from your phone.

Thank you, I really appreciate this. I've been looking for something exactly like this for ages, whilst trying to toss my current solution.

It's a great app, open source as well and works everywhere, even on the web. I migrated all my MFA to Ente Auth.

Re: Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

#43
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find them really useful, I find youtube to be a good thing in moderation. But its very helpful to have a timer forcing me to thoughtfully use the time I've allocated.

The "UnTrap"-Add-On for Firefox can block the more detrimental aspects of youtube, like shorts or the recommendation of other videos. I have it configured so that it always brings me directly to the "watch later"-playlist and I never go to the main page.

FreeTube is also phenomenal for de-enshittifying (dis-enshittifying?) the YouTube experience

Re: Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

#44
post #11

> Having your phone in the same room while doing cognitive work reliably drops your memory, attention, and overall cognitive performance. That is my biggest problem with most Multifactor authentication. I try to leave my phone in another room to focus, but needing the phone authenticator for something always happens within two hours. I still don't know why apps think a device I carry in the streets is safer than one…

This might defeat the purpose of MFA but I use an authenticator like Ente that works on the desktop and syncs to and from your phone.

It does not defeat the purpose as your MFA code/prompt as you are still protected even if someone has your password. The only slightly lesser protection is that if someone gains local access to your machine/password manager then everything is compromised vs. having your codes on your phone, but this should be very, very far down the list of security concerns for the majority of people.

The most realistic security threat for OTP's is that they can be phished in a few ways which is the same problem if you're using MFA stored on your desktop or phone. Hence the preference for physical security keys / passkeys which are impossible to phish.

Re: Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

#45
post #37
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Normal" people don't react that way to casinos.

Have you walked past one recently? Casinos used to have at least some veneer of sophistication - polished wood, baize, well-dressed croupiers - even if it was ultimately pretty thin. Now the whole room looks like a giant kiddie noisemaker toy.

[deleted]

Re: Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

#46
post #11

> Having your phone in the same room while doing cognitive work reliably drops your memory, attention, and overall cognitive performance. That is my biggest problem with most Multifactor authentication. I try to leave my phone in another room to focus, but needing the phone authenticator for something always happens within two hours. I still don't know why apps think a device I carry in the streets is safer than one…

> I still don't know why apps think a device I carry in the streets is safer [...]

Because MFA requirements have never been about security, only security theater. It's the modern version of the "you must change your password every 30 days" rule.

Re: Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

#47
post #11

> Having your phone in the same room while doing cognitive work reliably drops your memory, attention, and overall cognitive performance. That is my biggest problem with most Multifactor authentication. I try to leave my phone in another room to focus, but needing the phone authenticator for something always happens within two hours. I still don't know why apps think a device I carry in the streets is safer than one…

What would your employer say if you said “I don’t own a smartphone. What alternatives exist?”

My current employer has a little nub on my laptop that I touch, but my previous employer was big on making me check my smartphone.

Re: Protecting my attention at the dopamine carnival

#49
post #37
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Normal" people don't react that way to casinos.

Have you walked past one recently? Casinos used to have at least some veneer of sophistication - polished wood, baize, well-dressed croupiers - even if it was ultimately pretty thin. Now the whole room looks like a giant kiddie noisemaker toy.

Aside from general infantilization, another theory: The old status-signalling has moved on to something else, and past generations' signals of upper-class (or at least classier) gambling are now obsolete, so nobody bothers projecting them.
Post reply on HN