Live data from Hacker News

The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

incoherency.co.uk

41–50 of 60 posts

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

2 posts on that page are less than 6 months old and they are both posts of the same thing.

What? No, there are over 300 results when filtering by "last 6 months".

Maybe I'm spending less time here then. Not necessarily a bad thing

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#42
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remember what HN kept parroting in 2017? "bItCoIn is sCaM". So much of a scam that buying that coveted Tesla Model S in 2017 would sure have held its value much better than Bitcoin did and by now in 2025, Bitcoin should be worthless. Right? Not even close. If Bitcoin was a scam, was it supposed to "crash" from $10k to $100k+ and that Tesla Model S "skyrocketed" from $100k+ to around $40k from its retail price. Sounds…

Bitcoin is still a criminal ecosystem in 2025. Its only real use case still is enabling illegal transactions and evading financial regulations, and that maintains its speculative value; but that's still a scam not a true investment just like a business used as a front for Mafia appears stable until it inevitably comes crashing down. But I don't think anyone claimed criminality is not profitable. It can literally make…

> Bitcoin is still a criminal ecosystem in 2025

Welcome to reality, where good/neutral things sometimes are used for bad :) Name one financial system that doesn't have any elements of criminality involved in them.

> Its only real use case still is enabling illegal transactions and evading financial regulations, and that maintains its speculative value

So if I and others happen to have done at least one transaction with Bitcoin that wasn't illegal or evaded financial regulations, would presenting proof of that leading to you changing your view that there is no real use cases?

> that's still a scam not a true investment

Personally I draw the limit of what a "scam" is when it's intentionally misleading with the purpose of defrauding you. Bitcoin doesn't look like it's either of those things, but I will agree that the ecosystem has a lot of scammers within it, just like any financial system.

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#43
post #22
post #7

Yeah, Bitcoin was in a big bubble in 2017. If you were dumb enough to buy BTC then, today your portfolio would be a devastating +400%.

Remember what HN kept parroting in 2017? "bItCoIn is sCaM". So much of a scam that buying that coveted Tesla Model S in 2017 would sure have held its value much better than Bitcoin did and by now in 2025, Bitcoin should be worthless. Right? Not even close. If Bitcoin was a scam, was it supposed to "crash" from $10k to $100k+ and that Tesla Model S "skyrocketed" from $100k+ to around $40k from its retail price. Sounds…

...I know what you're trying to say, but cars are the textbook example of assets that don't preserve value.

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#44
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For how long does a "bubble" need to be in "the bubble" for it to not be considered a "bubble" anymore? I'm guessing there is a time limit involved here somewhere?

Economic downturn that motivates holders to liquidate. The house of cards would collapse very quickly if one whale cashed out. Everyone holding is facing a bad version of the prisoner's dilemma.

It already happened several times for BTC. Look for ATH drawdown chart.

Bitcoin has lost 75% of its value 4+ times, but for some strange reason everytime it "comes back stronger".

My thesis is that, in all these years, the BTC price has been composed of 2 parts: Speculators and "believers". Speculators will buy and sell very fast as soon as the market moved or due to external phenomena. "Believers" will keep holding through everything.

Thing is, with each cycle there is more money on Believers than Speculators. This time, ETFs and institutions have placed a lot more money, so it seems there are more and more Believers. That's why you see retail Speculators saying that this cycle is "boring".

It's interesting to see how the price will keep stabilizing, as the ratio of Believers vs Speculators money gets larger (Speculators become a smaller and smaller % of the price).

I think this was the last cycle (halving cycle) with that much volatility.

Even if you are not into bitcoin, it's interesting to study its phenomena.

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was here, and they still keep saying the same thing. There was a recent submission about Bitcoin. People were still saying how it is a scam and whatnot. Scam or not, many people have gotten rich off of it. I bet the people who kept saying it is a scam wish'd they bought when it was low, they would have been rich today, instead, they double down (because they completely missed their chance due to their opinion), whi…

Many more people have also lost money on it[1]. A Casino is also a great "investment" if you only count the winners. [1] https://gizmodo.com/bitcoin-crypto-bank-of-international-set...

I cannot imagine how people who have bought BTC early on for the price of bread lost their money. Care to shed some light on it? I understand that you cannot take out "lots of" money out of banks (that is how they work), but there are ways. Multiple cryptocurrency exchanges, etc.

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#46
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remember what HN kept parroting in 2017? "bItCoIn is sCaM". So much of a scam that buying that coveted Tesla Model S in 2017 would sure have held its value much better than Bitcoin did and by now in 2025, Bitcoin should be worthless. Right? Not even close. If Bitcoin was a scam, was it supposed to "crash" from $10k to $100k+ and that Tesla Model S "skyrocketed" from $100k+ to around $40k from its retail price. Sounds…

Bitcoin is still a criminal ecosystem in 2025. Its only real use case still is enabling illegal transactions and evading financial regulations, and that maintains its speculative value; but that's still a scam not a true investment just like a business used as a front for Mafia appears stable until it inevitably comes crashing down. But I don't think anyone claimed criminality is not profitable. It can literally make…

Bitcoin isn't anonymous. Cash is.

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah I remember the white paper being posted in 2009, took another 2 years before I got into bitcoin. The reason I know bitcoin has hit the mainstream and isn't going anywhere is in sort due to HN. This bubble has spurred zero posts as far as I can tell, or zero that gained any traction. In part this is because there is nothing new to discuss. But in the past there was nothing new either, but it gained traction becau…

> Welcome to the new asset class. Wasn't it supposed to be a currency people would buy stuff with that would eventually replace "fiat"? What happened to that?

That never made sense so it didn't happen.

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#48
post #20

BTC is still in a bubble and there is not much news about it :)

For how long does a "bubble" need to be in "the bubble" for it to not be considered a "bubble" anymore? I'm guessing there is a time limit involved here somewhere?

Maybe a generation or a lifetime. Gold is also a bubble but people are either into it or not so there's little discussion.

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#49
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Economic downturn that motivates holders to liquidate. The house of cards would collapse very quickly if one whale cashed out. Everyone holding is facing a bad version of the prisoner's dilemma.

It already happened several times for BTC. Look for ATH drawdown chart. Bitcoin has lost 75% of its value 4+ times, but for some strange reason everytime it "comes back stronger". My thesis is that, in all these years, the BTC price has been composed of 2 parts: Speculators and "believers". Speculators will buy and sell very fast as soon as the market moved or due to external phenomena. "Believers" will keep holding…

Backing the security with public programs just feels like the last step in a scam. As soon as BTC is backed by ETFs and government programs then suddenly the public are the people who make up the difference when whales cash out and crash the true value. It's a very efficient transfer of wealth. Backing a security like this adds no value to the public but puts large risk on it. There is no justification other than "we can steal from you so we will".

Re: The only time HN is this interested in Bitcoin is when there's a bubble (2017)

#50
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Economic downturn that motivates holders to liquidate. The house of cards would collapse very quickly if one whale cashed out. Everyone holding is facing a bad version of the prisoner's dilemma.

It already happened several times for BTC. Look for ATH drawdown chart. Bitcoin has lost 75% of its value 4+ times, but for some strange reason everytime it "comes back stronger". My thesis is that, in all these years, the BTC price has been composed of 2 parts: Speculators and "believers". Speculators will buy and sell very fast as soon as the market moved or due to external phenomena. "Believers" will keep holding…

Your thesis is 10+ year old: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/speculative-attack/

Always good to find back well known results by first principles!

Post reply on HN