Apple Research unearthed forgotten AI technique and using it to generate images
41–45 of 45 posts
Re: Apple Research unearthed forgotten AI technique and using it to generate images
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
The bitter-er lesson is that distillation from bigger models works pretty damn well. It’s great news for the GPU poor, not great for the guys training the models we distill from.
Distillation is great for researchers and hobbyists. But nearly all frontier models have anti-distillation ToS, so distillation is out of question for western commercial companies like Apple.
Re: Apple Research unearthed forgotten AI technique and using it to generate images
#43This subject is fascinating and the article is informative, but I wish that HN had a button like "flag", but specific for articles that seems written by AI (well at least the section "How STARFlow compares with OpenAI’s 4o image generator" sounds like it)
If you enjoyed the article, why would you want to flag or tag it? For what purpose?
Re: Apple Research unearthed forgotten AI technique and using it to generate images
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
somewhat hard to say how the cards fall when the cost of 'intelligence' is coming down 1000x year over year while at the same time compute continues to scale. the bet should be made on both sides probably
10x year over year, not 1000x, right? The 1000x is from this 10x observation having held for 3 years.
Re: Apple Research unearthed forgotten AI technique and using it to generate images
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I find it fascinating that Apple-centric media sites are stretching so much to position the company in the AI race Or, you know, just posting an article based on an Apple's press release about a new technique that falls squarely into their target audience (people reading Apple centric news) and is a great fit to current fashionable technologies (AI) people will show interest in. Without giving a fuck to "position t…
Precisely. Remember how they waited for AR/VR space to settle and then swept the end user market? Or the smash hit Homepods. Or Siri :)
Let's not forget that the iPod was a Mac only product, when the Mac just had like 3% of the market, with no Windows support and limited sales in the first versions. Or that the iPhone took a few years to dominate the market. Blackberry, Nokia and Microsoft even thought they had a chance for 3-4 years.
I wouldn't be surprised if their VR sales are already above all the other players (perhaps even combined).