Live data from Hacker News

FSE meets the FBI

blog.freespeechextremist.com

41–50 of 159 posts

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#41

FSE {free speech extremists}, why would one have to be an extremist in country where free speech is enshrined in its Constitutional Law.

You're asking that on a story specifically describing how the FBI is either avoiding or directly violating the constitutional restrictions they are supposed to follow?

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#42
are there any good open-source porn-detector models out there? if i ran an image board in 2025, that would be job #1, since it’s really just a weapon, and we don’t speak or print with our genitals—well, most of us anyway…

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#43
I really liked how the story starts with not wanting to introduce captcha because it hurts real users, then continues to spend the next 80% of it covering how open registrations and the public timeline were down for however long, extremely negatively impacting users.

Still, fun read though. Also made me definitively realize I can't imagine myself hosting a community space for others online.

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#46

[flagged]

The difference between terrorists and freedom fighters is whether they're aligned with my views. When it's the government making the distinction, the difference is whether they're aligned with the government's views.

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#47

FSE {free speech extremists}, why would one have to be an extremist in country where free speech is enshrined in its Constitutional Law.

Because the US has very unfree speech, despite what someone wrote on a piece of paper in 17-whatever year.

In general, the US ranks pretty low on most freedom metrics, except for the freedom to kill with a gun. In general, the more your country has to tell you you're free, the less free you actually are.

Many other countries explicitly do not have free speech in their constitution, but something more narrow, like freedom of opinion. In those countries, what rights the constitution says you get, and what rights you actually get, tend to be more closely in alignment.

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#48
post #46

[flagged]

The difference between terrorists and freedom fighters is whether they're aligned with my views. When it's the government making the distinction, the difference is whether they're aligned with the government's views.

No it's not. The main difference is that terrorists target civilian population as a means to get what they want, and freedom fighters target military.

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#49
post #48
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference between terrorists and freedom fighters is whether they're aligned with my views. When it's the government making the distinction, the difference is whether they're aligned with the government's views.

No it's not. The main difference is that terrorists target civilian population as a means to get what they want, and freedom fighters target military.

what's it called when military targets civilians to get what they want?

Re: FSE meets the FBI

#50
post #48
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference between terrorists and freedom fighters is whether they're aligned with my views. When it's the government making the distinction, the difference is whether they're aligned with the government's views.

No it's not. The main difference is that terrorists target civilian population as a means to get what they want, and freedom fighters target military.

Furthermore, a rebellion or freedom fighters in a moral framework is when you have an authoritarian regime, aka “the monster that comes for us all” (Andor S2) that needs to be overcome.

An authoritarian regime has no representation of the population, has no need for feedback, and is ruled by a few. In the work of Thomas Payne he says “When all rights have been taken away, the right of rebellion has been made perfect.”

Post reply on HN