Live data from Hacker News

Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

arxiv.org

41–50 of 110 posts

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#41

I wish bots would present as bots. There's no reason for the various LLM bots to have a human-like interface with a "personality" and it gives a misleading impression to users. They should all talk like the Star Trek computer imho.

I am ok with it as long as it doesn't start calling me 'Dave'.

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#42
post #31

Personally I think people should generally be polite and respectful towards the models. Not because they have feelings, but because cruelty degrades those who practice it.

ding ding ding. If you're rude to an LLM, those habits will bleed into your conversations with barista/etc.

Not necessarily, people will change behaviour based on context. Chat vs email vs HN comments, for example.

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#43

Personally I think people should generally be polite and respectful towards the models. Not because they have feelings, but because cruelty degrades those who practice it.

I agree! I try to remember to prompt as if I were writing to a colleague because I fear that if I get in the habit of treating them like a servant, it will degrade my tone in communicating with other humans over time.

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#45

I’m still going to talk to it like a person because if I don’t then I’ll slowly start to talk to people like they’re LLMs and it’s going to sound rude.

Has the way you comment on HN affected how you write emails or talk to people in real life?

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#46
My experience informs my opinion, that structure is more important than specific tone.

IMO If LLMs are made from our language, then terminology semantics plays strongly into the output, and degree of control.

Some people rage when the machine doesn't work as expected, but we know that, "computers are schizophrenic little children, and don't beat them when they're bad."[1] ... right? Similar applies to please.

I've had far better results by role playing group dynamics with stronger structure, like say, the military. Just naming the LLM up front as Lieutenant, or referencing in-brief a Full Metal Jacket-style dress-down with clear direction, have gotten me past many increasingly common hurdles with do-it-for-you models. Raging never works. You can't fire the machine. Being polite has been akin to giving a kid a cookie for breaking the cookie jar.

It is funny though, to see the Thinking phase say stuff like "The human is angry (in roleplay)..."

[1] https://www.stilldrinking.org/programming-sucks

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#47

Personally I think people should generally be polite and respectful towards the models. Not because they have feelings, but because cruelty degrades those who practice it.

Agreed. I caught some shit from some friends of mine when I got mildly annoyed that they were saying offensive things to my smart speakers, and yeah on the one hand it's silly, but at the same time... I dunno man, I don't like how quickly you turned into a real creepy bastard to a feminine voice when you felt you had social permission to. That's real weird.

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#48

When I'm working through a problem with Cursor, I find platitudes go a long way to keeping it grounded. However, when it really refuses to do something then then best way to break the pattern is harsh, stern wording. For example, if it's written code that's mostly correct but needs some tweaking, a platitude will keep it second guessing everything it just wrote. * "That looks great so far, can you tweak XYZ" -> Keeps…

[deleted]

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#49
post #40

I’m still going to talk to it like a person because if I don’t then I’ll slowly start to talk to people like they’re LLMs and it’s going to sound rude.

Did search engines increase rudeness?

Search engines don't speak English.

Re: Should We Respect LLMs? A Study on Influence of Prompt Politeness on Performance

#50

Personally I think people should generally be polite and respectful towards the models. Not because they have feelings, but because cruelty degrades those who practice it.

You're nice to AI for your own well being. I'm nice to AI so they spare me when they eventually become our overlords. We are not the same.
Post reply on HN