Live data from Hacker News

Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

harvard.edu

41–50 of 1001 posts

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#41
post #27

[flagged]

>3. Testimony before Congress that equated opposition to war crimes to antisemitism [4].

Can you link to a specific line of testimony that supports this allegation? "war crimes" isn't even mentioned in the article. Far too often claims like this devolve into a game of strawman/motte-and-bailey, where each side tries to paint their position as maximally charitable, and accuse the other side of rejecting the maximally charitable position.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#42

[flagged]

> The Federal government has always attached conditions in exchange for Federal funding and Federal contracts. This is not dictating.

It effectively is. Just look up the history of the drinking age - a classic example of the federal government using extortion tactics to override state rights.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#45
As information, the current administration is doing similar demands to foreign universities, trying to impose the point of view of the world in a president we didn't vote for.

Here is an article about the Trump administration demands to our universities.

https://www-publico-pt.translate.goog/2025/04/11/ciencia/not...

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#46
post #3

Harvard has a 50 billion endowment, what do they need federal funds for. If they value their intellectual independence so much, then cut the cord.

They don't. This is the federal government threatening to withhold payment for research they commissioned.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#47
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Much of that federal funding is for research, the same as any other R1 university. We all benefit from research findings. Endowments are used for other purposes. There are a few colleges that take no federal funding in order to maintain total independence (mostly for religious reasons). But their research output is virtually zero.

[flagged]

> I'd guess bad-to-good ratio is at least 10 to 1. Should we fix that?

Should we fix... what? Your unsubstantiated claim? You didn't even bother to do napkin math about it, you just asked a bunch of leading questions and then claimed inaction by the masses.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#49
post #10
post #3

Harvard has a 50 billion endowment, what do they need federal funds for. If they value their intellectual independence so much, then cut the cord.

Next step: taxing that endowment (which is a good idea irrespective of the other demands: universities are government-subsidized tax-free hedge funds)

Just consider the tax-exempt status as an indirect subsidy for research and education. I think its ROI is much higher than from any other way the government could use the uncollected amount.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#50
post #3

Harvard has a 50 billion endowment, what do they need federal funds for. If they value their intellectual independence so much, then cut the cord.

> Harvard has a 50 billion endowment, what do they need federal funds for. If they value their intellectual independence so much, then cut the cord.

I agree. Gulf monarchies will probably come in a give even more billions to these institutions anyway to make up for the losses. No strings attached of course...

Harvard probably already secured some more funding from Qatar and what not.

Post reply on HN