Is it wrong of me to be a little miffed that I paid $50, admittedly a long time ago, for Textmate?
Did Textmate come with a promise that your money would help fund the development of Textmate2?
Textmate2 Goes Open Source
41–50 of 314 posts
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#42Awesome! Can someone comment on how probable it would be to port it to linux (and windows)?
Well it's all in Obj-C, so either a non-OS X Obj-C compilation tool or rewrite it out all out of Obj-C. Doable, but I don't think many people will be queuing up for the task.
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't think it has anything to do with Sandboxing requirements in the App Store and Mountain Lion having an option not to allow non-App Store applications? I'm seriously asking, not trying to start a flame war here.
The original TextMate isn't on the App Store and I'd have to think the number of people who go into the Security settings and disallow running of non-App Store signed binaries is vanishingly small.
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#44Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't think it has anything to do with Sandboxing requirements in the App Store and Mountain Lion having an option not to allow non-App Store applications? I'm seriously asking, not trying to start a flame war here.
The original TextMate isn't on the App Store and I'd have to think the number of people who go into the Security settings and disallow running of non-App Store signed binaries is vanishingly small.
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#46Is it wrong of me to be a little miffed that I paid $50, admittedly a long time ago, for Textmate?
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#47I am not sure how to read the statement by Allan Odgaard. It does not include any hint on the future of Textmate: Has Textmate become open source abandonware or does Allan Odgaard intend to lead the future development of Textmate as an open source? The latter would of course be great, the former rather sad from a user perspective since most former closed source apps do not survive for long after a switch to open sour…
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#48Is it wrong of me to be a little miffed that I paid $50, admittedly a long time ago, for Textmate?
How many hours did you use it?
Well worth the $50
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did Textmate come with a promise that your money would help fund the development of Textmate2?
Textmate 1 came with a promise that you would get a free upgrade to Textmate 2. http://wiki.macromates.com/FAQ/TextMate2 Here the developer talks about regretting the free upgrade: http://old.nabble.com/TM2-to28405435.html#a28707277
Re: Textmate2 Goes Open Source
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well it's all in Obj-C, so either a non-OS X Obj-C compilation tool or rewrite it out all out of Obj-C. Doable, but I don't think many people will be queuing up for the task.
Erm, Objective-C probably isn't the problem, even NeXt used gcc for that (not sure how much of the current feature bloat isn't in copyrighted libraries). But GNUStep isn't exactly up to par with Cocoa, never mind not exactly the default desktop environment. Porting the whole editor from Obj-C++/Cocoa to C++/KDE or C/Gtk would be a pretty huge task, where you'd better off starting from scratch anyway (as with a lot of…