Live data from Hacker News

Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

newatlas.com

41–50 of 59 posts

Re: Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

#41
post #30

My mom is 76 and she had a virus ruin one of corneas. I wish this was already a common practice but I doubt she will be able to benefit from this. If your eye is irritated and redness doesn't go away for days - visit your doctor.

Whoa thats wild. Did they identify the virus?

Re: Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

#42

Tangentially-related: the recurrent corneal erosion that I've been managing (painfully and unsuccessfully) for a decade has finally seen some measure of remission after I started self-treating with Fingerprick Autologous Blood. It's what it says on the tin: I use a blood testing fingerprick to draw a few drops of blood, which I insert under my eyelid. Blink. Done. Not even a month and half with a bandage contact lens…

Damn that’s metal as fuck.

Re: Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

#43
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please refrain from posting deliberately misleading and inflammatory statements here. The studies in question involve administering hormonal treatments to mice to investigate health outcomes relevant to humans, not altering the gender identity of mice. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-tr...

Interesting times indeed https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/03/yes-biden-spent-...

Even if that were the case, is it wrong to support research into health related outcomes for American citizens? There’s nothing wrong with working on research to make American citizens medical and life outcomes better. That’s what government should be doing.

Re: Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

#44
post #26
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The posted article was about research to cure blindness with stem cells. The top comment implied that such research was being defunded. I asked for an example that was not about defunding research on transgender mice. The only examples provided were for research that was confused with transgender research. So it seems that Doge is not cutting research for curing blindness and the like but only for transgender and som…

They seem to be making broad cuts that will effect all research: https://apnews.com/article/trump-cuts-research-funding-nih-d...

Re: Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$455,000: “A Mouse Model to Test the Effects of Gender-affirming Hormone Therapy on HIV Vaccine-induced Immune Responses

You realize a lot of hormones could be classified as gender-affirming, right? Testosterone therapy would be gender-affirming for most men. Huge numbers of women take progesterone. Many, many others hormones reinforce gender-associated behaviours and physiology. No one thinks anything of it until someone is taking it for reasons they don’t approve of. But we could manipulate all kinds of studies we don’t agree with be…

It’s the title the researchers chose.

Re: Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

#48

Tangentially-related: the recurrent corneal erosion that I've been managing (painfully and unsuccessfully) for a decade has finally seen some measure of remission after I started self-treating with Fingerprick Autologous Blood. It's what it says on the tin: I use a blood testing fingerprick to draw a few drops of blood, which I insert under my eyelid. Blink. Done. Not even a month and half with a bandage contact lens…

Is there any medical studies on this or how did you know to try it? What’s going on at the biomolecular level?

Re: Stem cell therapy trial reverses "irreversible" damage to cornea

#50
post #48

Tangentially-related: the recurrent corneal erosion that I've been managing (painfully and unsuccessfully) for a decade has finally seen some measure of remission after I started self-treating with Fingerprick Autologous Blood. It's what it says on the tin: I use a blood testing fingerprick to draw a few drops of blood, which I insert under my eyelid. Blink. Done. Not even a month and half with a bandage contact lens…

Is there any medical studies on this or how did you know to try it? What’s going on at the biomolecular level?

It was mentioned on a reddit thread that I can no longer find, which prompted me to look up studies. I don't think that the mechanism is fully known, but apparently the research that has been done was prompted by the success of designer drugs that are derived from a patient's blood, as a way to make a similar treatment more accessible.
Post reply on HN