Earlier quoted context omitted.
> AMD is probably undervalued, but Nvidia is clearly way overvalued. AMD trades at a price to earnings ratio of 99, NVDA trades at a PE of ~38. PE isn't everything when looking at companies, but I don't see other reasons to think AMD is undervalued
Is PE even anything? If you guided your investing based on sane PE ratios for the past decade you would have been consistently unhappy with missing out on huge gains in tech companies.
AMD YOLO
41–50 of 85 posts
Re: AMD YOLO
#42I would really love it if people on Hacker News could weigh in on how much of a moat they think CUDA really is. As in: How hard is it to use something else? If you started a project today how much would you want to get paid to not use CUDA? A lot of readers on this site have a good insight into this and it is a key question financial people are asking without the knowledge many people here possess.
Re: AMD YOLO
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
AMD's PE ratio looks high because of their Xilinx acquisition and for tax reasons. You have to look at non-GAAP numbers instead, e.g. AMD's forward PE ratio which is only ~20 or so. Nvidia's forward PE is ~30.
just bought a little amd with zero dilligence, and now i see they aquired xilinx? why would anyone do that... remorse.
[1]: https://ir.amd.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/977/amd...
Re: AMD YOLO
#44I would really love it if people on Hacker News could weigh in on how much of a moat they think CUDA really is. As in: How hard is it to use something else? If you started a project today how much would you want to get paid to not use CUDA? A lot of readers on this site have a good insight into this and it is a key question financial people are asking without the knowledge many people here possess.
Re: AMD YOLO
#45I would really love it if people on Hacker News could weigh in on how much of a moat they think CUDA really is. As in: How hard is it to use something else? If you started a project today how much would you want to get paid to not use CUDA? A lot of readers on this site have a good insight into this and it is a key question financial people are asking without the knowledge many people here possess.
So why give away the valuable knowledge away for free?
Re: AMD YOLO
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
But they are making strides in robotics already. Jensen is super smart, business-savvy AND hard-working. These are some of many reasons I own NVDA.
Honestly, I'm having a hard time with my sarcasm detector here. Plenty of others working on robots. Plenty of smart, business savvy, hard working CEOs that didn't win the next round of the infinite game. I like nvidia, I think they're doing good work, but I don't think their current trajectory is some sort of well-moated flywheel the way some others think it is. Selling shovels during a gold rush can make you rich, i…
This is the best way to put it, it's exactly this.
Re: AMD YOLO
#47Re: AMD YOLO
#48Do all of geohot's posts come off as manic to anyone else?
Re: AMD YOLO
#49> Bought in for a quarter million. Long term. It can always dip short term, but check back in 5 years. So basically he got 2 MI300s and is currently trying to pump AMD?
Not two cards, two boxes (with 8 cards each I'd assume).
Re: AMD YOLO
#50I would really love it if people on Hacker News could weigh in on how much of a moat they think CUDA really is. As in: How hard is it to use something else? If you started a project today how much would you want to get paid to not use CUDA? A lot of readers on this site have a good insight into this and it is a key question financial people are asking without the knowledge many people here possess.
"As fast as AMD tries to fill in the CUDA moat, NVIDIA engineers are working overtime to deepen said moat with new features, libraries, and performance updates."