Live data from Hacker News

Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

sesame.com

41–50 of 231 posts

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#41

I must be doing something wrong, but the demo seems to be the voice having a conversation with itself? It doesn't let me interject, and it answers its own questions. There's some kind of feedback loop here, it seems.

It happened to me cause it was hearing itself through my external speakers, I disabled them and it worked fine afterwards.

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#44
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now here's a little thought experiment. What does the world look like in 5 years when everyone is talking to these things that are indistinguishable from a real person? They will be funnier, more compassionate, less judgemental, smarter, and superficially "better" in every respect.

I've been asking this for years. People keep saying stuff like "but you'll want the human touch." Really? So when was the last time you asked someone for directions? Personally, I'd rather google something or discuss with ChatGPT than make someone listen to me for an hour. And that someone has to be extremely knowledgeable about a lot of different topics! Even here. Would I rather converse with y'all and get downvote…

[deleted]

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#46

I must be doing something wrong, but the demo seems to be the voice having a conversation with itself? It doesn't let me interject, and it answers its own questions. There's some kind of feedback loop here, it seems.

Try headphones.

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#47
i turned it on while i was heating some hot chocolate

told it, "hold on" as i was putting on my headset, they said "no problem". but then i tried to fill the empty airtime by saying, "i'm uhh heating some hot chocolate?"

the ai's response was something like, "ah.. (something) (something). data processing or is it the real kind with marshmallows"

not 100% on the exact dialog but 100% would not have been fooled by this. closed it there. no uncanny valley situation for me.

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#48
"I hate to say this, but I was deeply offended by this model. It sounds more human-like, but it has a strong bias toward political views. I don’t want to talk about the topic that was discussed. However, I would never allow my children to listen to this. I’m surprised that AI is capable of making me this mad. At first, I was excited about a tremendous leap into the future, but now I’m worried about the level of mind control this technology could have over children."

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#49
post #5

AI voice is an overwhelmingly harmful technology. It's biggest use will be to hurt people.

It will unfortunately undoubtedly be used for mass automation of scams but text AI (and pre-AI automation) have been used for that for many years as well. Doesn't really make sense to say "ok we should allow all forms of AI besides voice because of scams", I think. But yes, there needs to be some spreading of public awareness.

That's if you answer phone calls from numbers not already in your contacts. For me all such numbers go to voicemail and if the voice is of someone i know ill just call them directly.

If you do any of the above you are looking to be scammed!

Re: Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice

#50
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now here's a little thought experiment. What does the world look like in 5 years when everyone is talking to these things that are indistinguishable from a real person? They will be funnier, more compassionate, less judgemental, smarter, and superficially "better" in every respect.

I've been asking this for years. People keep saying stuff like "but you'll want the human touch." Really? So when was the last time you asked someone for directions? Personally, I'd rather google something or discuss with ChatGPT than make someone listen to me for an hour. And that someone has to be extremely knowledgeable about a lot of different topics! Even here. Would I rather converse with y'all and get downvote…

I expect there'll be two phases to this. First phase is the widespread use of disembodied voice partners/friends/assistants. Then the second phase will be embodiment, which gives you oxytocin from touch, etc.

Can't see this going well for the fertility crisis.

The tech oligarchs then invest in ectogenesis technology, and use their sperm to dominate the gene pool.

Post reply on HN