Live data from Hacker News

Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

matrix.org

41–50 of 163 posts

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#41
post #23

Anyone have an idea why the matrix.org bridges are so expensive to run? e.g. t2bot.io also runs Matrix bridges and the costs are only about $1.5k/mo [0], not $100k [0]: https://t2bot.io/donations/

It looks like the site you are referring to quotes pure ISP costs while the matrix foundation bridge costs include maintaining bridge related software they would otherwise archive.

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#42
post #23

Anyone have an idea why the matrix.org bridges are so expensive to run? e.g. t2bot.io also runs Matrix bridges and the costs are only about $1.5k/mo [0], not $100k [0]: https://t2bot.io/donations/

the $100k is to fund folks to maintain the bridge software, as well as the hardware costs of running them.

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#43
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We've had this with XMPP already.

yes and XMPP is actually a messaging protocol. Matrix is an eventually consistent database with a crappy messaging app implemented on top, and because of the insane architecture they are justifying decisions like message ordering that is non-deterministic[0] -- for multi user chat! What could possibly go wrong if users in a multi user chat see messages in different orders? This decision is a perfect example of how sm…

Even the E2EE implementation is garbage. To this day fifty percent of the conversation in every E2EE group chat I'm in is "Hey XYZ I can't see your messages because they fail to decrypt" because they still have bugs in how clients distribute their keys to other clients. Imagine the state of a chat platform literally failing at chat.

Or look at how until a few months ago, the media store of every homeserver served media on the internet without any authentication. Someone just had to post CP in a popular room and they'd get hundreds of servers rehosting it for free. (Recently they finally added the ability to require authentication for the media store, although they didn't add support for it to their web client, only their new Android one.)

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#44
post #28
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We've had this with XMPP already.

Oh, but people don't like XML. XML means xmpp is awful apparently. I feel pretty alone in having a bad experience with matrix, but a good one with xmpp+omemo.

whoa I totally did not get the memo on omemo this sounds great

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#45
post #30

I have had only bad experience with its federation and chat clients over many years, I don't think it can improve, if it could, they probably would have fixed it a long time ago. Maybe not a popular opinion, but they should let the Matrix die altogether so something better can replace it.

Like... XMPP ?

IETF standard, massivelly used (video-games https://xmpp.org/uses/gaming/, IM https://xmpp.org/uses/instant-messaging/, social...), modern features, managed by a fundation with a good ecosystem and plenty of alive projects: https://xmpp.org/software/ .

Yes its not perfect, yes there's still things to improve, but the clients are there, working, on many platforms. The server-S (yes several of them!) as well, they can scale, they can adapt to many use cases.

Matrix did a few things better than XMPP (the Spaces/Servers things, that XMPP is still figuring out), but for most of the rest... well.

Oh and there's also many bridges on XMPP, maintained by different projects, and they don't need 100K$ to stay alive :)

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#46

[flagged]

> I'm shocked that Matrix Foundation is considering shutting down if they don't raise $100K - what's going on behind the scenes here?

That’s not what’s happening. The point is that running and maintaining bridges requires $, and without $ that won’t happen.

The problem on financials is underfunding.

edit: If you’re interested in how we’ve ended up there: https://fosdem.org/2025/events/attachments/fosdem-2025-6274-...

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#47
post #38
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, but people don't like XML. XML means xmpp is awful apparently. I feel pretty alone in having a bad experience with matrix, but a good one with xmpp+omemo.

I found XMPP an absolute delight to work with and built all kinds of command-and-control messaging utils with it that allowed me the flexibility to use it as a chat service and RPC broker all at the same time, with bots as APIs. It was nuts but brilliant. Bring it back, I say.

Coincidentally I just got an XMPP server going and have a bunch of people happily chatting on it. Yeah it has its issues, but it's an open, well-defined protocol evolved over a long period of time. It won't disappear if its singular maintainer disappears (referring to both Signal and Matrix here).

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#49

[flagged]

> I'm shocked that Matrix Foundation is considering shutting down if they don't raise $100K - what's going on behind the scenes here? That’s not what’s happening. The point is that running and maintaining bridges requires $, and without $ that won’t happen. The problem on financials is underfunding. edit: If you’re interested in how we’ve ended up there: https://fosdem.org/2025/events/attachments/fosdem-2025-6274-...

It's a spam account, look at their profile, karma and other comments.

Re: Matrix Foundation to shut down bridges if it doesn't raise $100K

#50
post #23

Anyone have an idea why the matrix.org bridges are so expensive to run? e.g. t2bot.io also runs Matrix bridges and the costs are only about $1.5k/mo [0], not $100k [0]: https://t2bot.io/donations/

Matrix.org is the hugest public Matrix server, plus $100k is not just infrastructure costs, but development and maintenance of the bridges as well. As an etke.cc developer, I can assure you that development, maintenance, and operations even a small bridge is no joke.

t2bot's costs look like infrastructure and operation costs, not development and maintenance.

Disclaimer: I'm Aine of etke.cc, we offer managed Matrix servers with numerous different components, including bridges. Some of the components (like Postmoogle - email bridge) are developed and maintained by our team.

Post reply on HN