Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. I'm all for Graham's pyramid of disagreement: we should focus on the core argument, rather than superfluous things like tone, or character, or capitalisation. But this is too much for me personally. I just realised I consider the complete lack of capitalisation on a piece of public intellectual work to be obnoxious. Sorry, it's impractical, distracting and generates unnecessary cognitive load for everyone el…
It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. It's the new black turtleneck that everyone is wearing, but will swear upon their mother's life isn't because they're copying Steve Jobs.
Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
41–50 of 116 posts
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. It's the new black turtleneck that everyone is wearing, but will swear upon their mother's life isn't because they're copying Steve Jobs.
> It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. I know this is true but does anyone understand why they do it? It is actually cognitively disruptive when reading content because many of us are trained to simultaneously proof read while reading. So I also consider it a type of cognitive attack vector and it annoys me extremely as well.
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#43There are many useful tricks - like cosine distance. In contrast, softmax has a very deep grounding in statistical physics - where it is called the Boltzmann distribution. In fact, this connection between statistical physics and machine learning was so fundamental that it was a key part of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded to Hopfield and Hinton.
Study of thermodynamics gave rise to many concepts in information theory and statistics, but I wouldn't say that there is any direct connection per se between thermodynamics and any field where statistics or information theory are applicable. And the reasoning behind the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was... quite innovative.
Thermodynamics can absolutely be studied through both a statistical mechanics and an information theory lens, and many physicists have found this to be quite productive and enlightening. Especially when it gets to tricky cases involving entropy, like Maxwell's Demon and Landauer's Eraser, one struggles not to do so.
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. It's the new black turtleneck that everyone is wearing, but will swear upon their mother's life isn't because they're copying Steve Jobs.
> It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. I know this is true but does anyone understand why they do it? It is actually cognitively disruptive when reading content because many of us are trained to simultaneously proof read while reading. So I also consider it a type of cognitive attack vector and it annoys me extremely as well.
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. I'm all for Graham's pyramid of disagreement: we should focus on the core argument, rather than superfluous things like tone, or character, or capitalisation. But this is too much for me personally. I just realised I consider the complete lack of capitalisation on a piece of public intellectual work to be obnoxious. Sorry, it's impractical, distracting and generates unnecessary cognitive load for everyone el…
It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. It's the new black turtleneck that everyone is wearing, but will swear upon their mother's life isn't because they're copying Steve Jobs.
wasn't aware that this makes me a steve jobs copier :(
EDIT: people are seriously so emotionally invested in capitalization that i get downvoted into minus, jeez.
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#46An aside: please use proper capitalization. With this article I found myself backtracking thinking I’d missed a word, which was very annoying. Not sure what the authors intention was with that decision but please reconsider.
I'll likely continue using Capitalization as a preference and that we use it to express conventions in programming, but I totally understand the movement to drop it and frankly its logical enough.
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#47An aside: please use proper capitalization. With this article I found myself backtracking thinking I’d missed a word, which was very annoying. Not sure what the authors intention was with that decision but please reconsider.
Language evolves. Capitalization is an artifact of a period where capitalizing the first letter made a lot of sense for the medium (parchment/paper). Modern culture is abandoning it for speed efficiency on keyboards or digital keyboards. A purist would say that we should still be using all capitals like they did in Greek/Latin which again was related to the medium. I'll likely continue using Capitalization as a prefe…
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. I know this is true but does anyone understand why they do it? It is actually cognitively disruptive when reading content because many of us are trained to simultaneously proof read while reading. So I also consider it a type of cognitive attack vector and it annoys me extremely as well.
The sibling comment to yours mentions that this is pretty common on Twitter, and I'd guess that it started as a way to making firing off tweets from a phone easier (since the extra effort to hit shift when typing on a phone keyboard is a bit higher, and the additional effort to go back and fix any typos that happen due to trying to capitalize things is also higher compared to using a traditional keyboard). Once enoug…
I'm a bit confused about this. Do people turn off auto capitalisation on their phones? I very rarely have to press shift on my phone
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#49An aside: please use proper capitalization. With this article I found myself backtracking thinking I’d missed a word, which was very annoying. Not sure what the authors intention was with that decision but please reconsider.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/feb/18/death-of-cap...
Re: Softmax forever, or why I like softmax
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. It's the new black turtleneck that everyone is wearing, but will swear upon their mother's life isn't because they're copying Steve Jobs.
> It's a fad associated with AI, popularised by Sam Altman especially. I know this is true but does anyone understand why they do it? It is actually cognitively disruptive when reading content because many of us are trained to simultaneously proof read while reading. So I also consider it a type of cognitive attack vector and it annoys me extremely as well.
What does this mean?