Live data from Hacker News

The History of S.u.S.E

abortretry.fail

41–50 of 132 posts

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#41
SuSE was my first Linux system and it helped a lot to spark my interest. Yast (software manager) and SaX (XFree86 configuration tool) were a Godsend for a noob like me in 199x.

It's still solid today, and I hold it in high regards, even if I moved to greener Linux pastures.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#44
post #7

I've been a user of openSUSE since "openSUSE", nearly. It's my daily driver, today. I want to say I was playing with Mandrake, Red Hat and a little Gentoo at the time. I started using it regularly around 2010ish - I was working at a Windows shop and had a pretty elaborate home lab with Windows servers and domain controllers so I could do things at home "before trying that on corporate." I remember the deciding factor…

> I want to say I was playing with Mandrake, Red Hat and a little Gentoo at the time.

I don't know when you started playing with all of these and for how long, so it can be absolutely how you said (in the end, it's your own life!) but chances are you mostly used Mandriva, since the Mandrake name disappeared in 2005.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#45

My first introduction to linux was SuSE 7.2. Got it in the physical box from a local Borders bookstore. I think I was about 12-13 years old. Installed it on the family Gateway computer (PIII, 128mb ram).

Yeah I used to love the era of boxed Linux distros with manuals in bookstores and computer stores.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#46
post #30

SUSE has always been this perennial figure in the Linux world for me; the Linux Distro that isn't talked about often, but is generally liked and respected, by most people who use it. I ran OpenSUSE for about a year in 2013-2014, and it did sort of have the Just Works nature to it: things did more or less what I expected them to do without much tinkering. It was the first Linux that I liked enough to be my sole operat…

I use it at (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, at work); I never particularly liked or disliked it; but once they adopted systemd - I lost respect for it.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#47

IMHO, Deutsche Linux-Distribution (DLD) was the first german linux distribution (first release in 1992).

So it's not just a meme that Germans like to put "Deutsche" in front of every product/company name, it's the reality. How imaginative, the marketing departments who come up with these names must be making bank.

Every country does.

American Express

British Telecom

Etc

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#48
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So it's not just a meme that Germans like to put "Deutsche" in front of every product/company name, it's the reality. How imaginative, the marketing departments who come up with these names must be making bank.

That the distribution was a fully translated system together with a thick manual (of course also in German) was the whole point and idea. Your comment is too dismissive in my opinion.

The manual was pretty much a Linux for beginners book. It not only explained installation and basic system administration, but had substantial vim and Emacs chapters, as well as a chapter on retro gaming using emulators. (SuSE 5.3 in my case).

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#49
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FWIW, I believe btrfs is also the default FS for Fedora these days (though not Red Hat Enterprise Linux).

True but SUSE (the enterprise version) is pretty clear about the use of btrfs, just use it for the OS (snapshots), the "data" partition should always be XFS.

AFAIK (though not as connected to Red Hat storage team these days), RHEL is pretty much XFS plus logical volume managers. As I understand it, ZFS was just a non-starter because of licensing + Oracle and the feeling was that btrfs just wasn't quite there.

Re: The History of S.u.S.E

#50
post #30

SUSE has always been this perennial figure in the Linux world for me; the Linux Distro that isn't talked about often, but is generally liked and respected, by most people who use it. I ran OpenSUSE for about a year in 2013-2014, and it did sort of have the Just Works nature to it: things did more or less what I expected them to do without much tinkering. It was the first Linux that I liked enough to be my sole operat…

I use it at (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, at work); I never particularly liked or disliked it; but once they adopted systemd - I lost respect for it.

Sorry for your loss. I personally find that systemd solves real problems and makes Linux better. It has worts, but so does everything.
Post reply on HN