Live data from Hacker News

To buy a Tesla Model 3, only to end up in hell

myteslaexperience.com

41–50 of 593 posts

Re: To buy a Tesla Model 3, only to end up in hell

#41
post #33

> It is the electric car with the lowest consumption (12.5 kW / 100 km) Anyone have any idea what this means? What's power divided by distance?

I assumed they missed an 'h' there.

People seem to get easily confused by the W/Wh and A/Ah thing. A rental car I've took recently showed power usage in 'kWh per hour'. Bleh.

Re: To buy a Tesla Model 3, only to end up in hell

#43
post #9

i've been lucky with my model Y purchase in that there have been no issues with the car itself so far. i would certainly never buy a tesla again, however.

Tesla is super annoying as well since there aren't many body shops that they have approved to work on the car. Prepare to wait months. That's in Sydney AU, not sure about the US.

Same in the US.

And if you take the car into an unapproved body shop, maybe it’ll get remotely disabled.

Re: To buy a Tesla Model 3, only to end up in hell

#45

The safest bet in EVs is to buy one from the Korean manufacturers - they have the tech figured out (and have had it for a few years), they make everything from 'car but electric' to 'Jetsons spaceship', they're reasonably priced, they have cheap and abundant parts, have mechanics who know how to work on them, and they don't have an 'X' factor CEO.

I like the concept of this, but they just don’t feel to be “nice” places to be in like some of the European marques. The Volvos are about the most comfortable “normal” cars I’ve been in, the Kia’s / Hyundais/ MGs / Toyotas feel like sitting on badly covered sofas on a wishy washy suspension platform, without enough sound deadening.

Re: To buy a Tesla Model 3, only to end up in hell

#49
post #8

Tesla sales are plummeting all over the world currently, also in the US. But with Musk in the US government, I wonder how long it will take before there will be tariffs on foreign cars big enough to pretty much force US citizens to buy his Tesla's.

On the other hand Trump killed the EV charger subsidies, so that doesn't really help Tesla.

He didn't kill the funding, he's just violating the US Constitution by deliberately failing at his job to enforce the laws. We should avoid phrasing that makes it sound normal. (Congress can "kill" a law, he can't.)

That said, it's hard to say what motive might be going on. Did someone just convince him that it was a safe thing to target? Does he think his actions will frustrate or hurt Democratic states? Or maybe he just needs something in jeopardy that he can hold above Elon as a form of extortion.

Post reply on HN