41–50 of 981 posts
Take for example 675k paid for 31 songs. So 20k a song. If we estimate book to be say 10MB that would 8 million works. So I think reasonable compensation is something along 163 billion. Not even 10 years of net income. Which I think is entirely fair punishment.
Eye for an eye. Meta losses rights to 81.7 TB of IP. Transcribed into a text file
Meta already does that to themselves every year or so, deleting all internal communications. They've thrown away a huge amount of communication to source code commit reinforcement training data as a result. They do it to avoid emails making it into trials like this.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meta already does that to themselves every year or so, deleting all internal communications. They've thrown away a huge amount of communication to source code commit reinforcement training data as a result. They do it to avoid emails making it into trials like this.
> Meta already does that to themselves every year or so, deleting all internal communications. Aren't they obligated by law to keep all internal communication?
So if I torrented and seeded, I would be doing it for my own entertainment, not commercially. I expect big copy-write holders to come after myself. If Meta does it - I guess they have better lawyers ? Could make interesting case law.
> Could make interesting case law. Yeah, to perpetuate this system where only those who can afford lawyers get to benefit
So according to some AI, the damages awarded per infringed work is ~$750 minimum in the US. 80TB of books, each let's say 10MB on average, would be 8 million works. So Meta should pay 6 billion USD for their copyright infringement?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meta already does that to themselves every year or so, deleting all internal communications. They've thrown away a huge amount of communication to source code commit reinforcement training data as a result. They do it to avoid emails making it into trials like this.
> Meta already does that to themselves every year or so, deleting all internal communications. Aren't they obligated by law to keep all internal communication?
You may be thinking of certain financial institutions where it is a hard requirement, and maybe there are some other regulated industries too that have it.