I think this was super interesting, it sounds like he’s leaning more into “open” than openai is. “In disruptive tech, closed-source moats are fleeting. Even OpenAI’s closed-source model can’t prevent others from catching up. “Therefore, our real moat lies in our team’s growth—accumulating know-how, fostering an innovative culture. Open-sourcing and publishing papers don’t result in significant losses. For technologis…
Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
41–50 of 65 posts
Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#42They are nice words, ironically though their product is an exact clone of a US product (apart from the data stealing discussion). You could argue the cheaper aspect is innovating, but that's what China has been doing for many products.
To the best of my knowledge, there's nothing quite like R1-Zero released by OpenAI or others, they seem to really be pushing innovation. Relevant ARC-Prize post and discussion from yesterday: https://arcprize.org/blog/r1-zero-r1-results-analysis https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42868390
Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#43Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s a pretty common phrase for “what’s the ultimate goal?” I don’t think it’s meant to be taken as a chess metaphor.
While less figurative, I don't see how "what's the ultimate goal for large AI models" makes it less scary. Some of it might have to do with my having recently watched Dune Prophecy (set in the aftermath of the Butlerian Jihad) but this recent rapid progress in AI is putting me in somewhat of an apocalyptic mindset.
Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#45Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#46Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#47Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're describing a lot of tech companies like Google that had all these different orgs that were money sinks not related to a direct source of revenue and funded by dominance in search and high margins. And these programs didn't necessarily yield great creative products. Quite the opposite. Whereas if you have some objective measure that's driving your decisions, like revenue or customer engagement (proxy for useful…
Having the right culture is easier said than done. The enshittification of nearly everything can largely be attributed to the difficulty of maintaining that culture of open-ended creation without direct accountability to revenue.
Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#49It's a great interview throughout, but I was thrown off by this strange question (which I found to be much more interesting than the answer): > An Yong: What do you envision as the endgame for large AI models? I don't know if it has a different meaning/connotation in Chinese, but reading this metaphor with a Chess connotation scared me. If there is a game, who are the players? what is the victory condition? will ther…
Isn't "endgame" a common expression to mean "the end", "the place where there's no progress anymore" etc ?
Re: Interview with DeepSeek Founder: We're Done Following. It's Time to Lead
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having the right culture is easier said than done. The enshittification of nearly everything can largely be attributed to the difficulty of maintaining that culture of open-ended creation without direct accountability to revenue.
have to disagree there - the enshittification of nearly everything is 100% attributable to the seductive nature of rent seeking (more specifically, trying to gouge ever more in recurring revenue from people who you try to ensure have no other options). even companies who have innovative products and positive revenue streams have gone down that road.
(Hint: to make a profit and deliver profits to shareholders and investors)