If the author's reading this, the site renders like this in a recent Firefox - https://i.imgur.com/lazMsqx.png
The Ribbon Microphone
41–50 of 70 posts
Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#42If the author's reading this, the site renders like this in a recent Firefox - https://i.imgur.com/lazMsqx.png
@media (min-resolution: 1.5dppx) {
:root {
font-size: 2.4rem;
}
}
My 27 inch 4k monitor comes in at a device pixel ratio of ~1.58, triggering this (presumably) phone-targeted style.Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#43Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#44Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#45Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#46For anyone interested in how mucrophones can sound different, check out Jim Lill's video [1] where he A/B tests a bunch of mics against one another and industry standards. He has a whole series of videos where he explores what contributes the most to "guitar tone", all the way from the strings to your ears and in between. It's a bit of an eye opener to say the least. Highly, highly recommended. 1: https://youtu.be/4B…
Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#47Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, a ribbon microphone is sort-of a dual of a dynamic microphone if you squint hard enough. An electrostatic speaker is closer to the inverse of a condenser (capacitor) microphone
Just to add: inverse of ribbon microphone is ribbon speaker [1]. [1] https://www.psaudio.com/blogs/pauls-posts/how-a-ribbon-speak...
Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#49If the author's reading this, the site renders like this in a recent Firefox - https://i.imgur.com/lazMsqx.png
My blog had the same problem until I removed the css styles that triggered the font size.
Re: The Ribbon Microphone
#50It also led to the ability to sing in a quieter, more natural way, and gave birth to the "crooner" style. The earlier popularized carbon button microphone (invented in 1878) didn’t enable this personal singing style. If you look at one you might mistake it for the receiver of an old telephone handset (which in essence it was).