41–50 of 271 posts
It's almost as if only Git is distributed, but people sold out to Github for convenience. Too bad Git lacks a distributed bug tracker and wiki system like Fossil. Guess Github has to fail a lot more for things to change.
Email and mailing lists?
It's almost as if only Git is distributed, but people sold out to Github for convenience. Too bad Git lacks a distributed bug tracker and wiki system like Fossil. Guess Github has to fail a lot more for things to change.
people could not be more clear that their preference is for reliable and easy-to-use centralized services maintained by professionals, and not decentralized systems that require a great deal of user expertise
It's almost as if only Git is distributed, but people sold out to Github for convenience. Too bad Git lacks a distributed bug tracker and wiki system like Fossil. Guess Github has to fail a lot more for things to change.
> Too bad Git lacks a distributed bug tracker Email and mailing lists?
Otherwise you can claim Facebook is distributed because you can email people links to Facebook pages.
It's almost as if only Git is distributed, but people sold out to Github for convenience. Too bad Git lacks a distributed bug tracker and wiki system like Fossil. Guess Github has to fail a lot more for things to change.
It's almost as if only Git is distributed, but people sold out to Github for convenience. Too bad Git lacks a distributed bug tracker and wiki system like Fossil. Guess Github has to fail a lot more for things to change.
- A canonical name and place on the web;
- Access policy enforcement (who can commit and when);
- The whole pull request thing, with tags, issues, review, discussion, etc linked to it;
- Code review, linked to said policy enforcement;
- Issue tracking, even as basic as what GitHub offers;
- A trusted store for signing keys, so commits are verified;
- CI/CD triggers and runners;
- A page with releases, including binary releases, and a CDN allowing to use the download links without fear.
This is way more than distrusted version tracking. Actually the above is not even married to Git; it could be as valuable with Mercurial, or even Perforce.
This is a large product, actually a combination of many potentially self-contained products. It should not be compared to Git, but rather to Gitea or BitBucket. Not all of this can be reasonably decentralized, though quite a bit can.
It's almost as if only Git is distributed, but people sold out to Github for convenience. Too bad Git lacks a distributed bug tracker and wiki system like Fossil. Guess Github has to fail a lot more for things to change.