Live data from Hacker News

A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

flatfootfox.com

41–50 of 169 posts

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#41
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can't say I understand how $10/month is expensive. Quality search results ultimately save time digging through poor quality search results. Add up 300+ searches per month and surely you're hitting minimum wage value at least. The value proposition is absolutely there at $10.

Value proposition should be compared to the low cost alternative. Is it $10 better than Google? Maybe, I am not sure.

I am comparing it to the low cost alternative.

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#42
post #23

I’d happily pay for it if they stopped doing AI bullshit. That I won’t pay for.

This isn't meant to persuade you, just sharing my own experience. I've found myself almost relying on Kagi's `Quick Answer`. Its fantastic having it off by default and being able to opt-in when I just want a quick summary of some brief search where the info cards don't give me what I want right away.

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#43
post #2

Kagi is a tough pill to swallow. Their search is hands down the best around, there's no other way around it. That being said, $10/mo is also expensive. The workaround I found is using Kagi Ultimate. I get access to Claude (and I'm still able to attach files + access a dozen other LLMs) for $25/mo, so I was able to cancel Claude and keep Kagi and get the best of both worlds from either product. Side note: incredible t…

I love it too, and I do think it's expensive, too.

A lot of people laugh at thinking $10 (USD) pm is expensive, of course it's not huge money for most people. The problem is Kagi is a kind of "vote" towards moving the internet away from the ad-supported crapware trying to spy on your every click and capture your attention non-stop. If you're trying to replace a lot of free services with paid services to cast said vote towards shaping the web into what it should be, these costs really add up.

After paying for search, email, supporting a creator or two (e.g. a podcast), and some software here or there, you can easily end up in the hundreds of dollars, then you look back and notice that at best you've saved yourself from a few annoying ads and maybe gotten a fractionally better service and at worst your experience is unchanged and you're just deriving some intangible satisfaction from having not been spied on (which at the individual level doesn't make much difference unless millions of people follow your lead) or supporting a creator you admire.

It's tough.

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#44
I've been subscribed to Kagi since trying it out early on in 2023 and have been paying the $10/mo for unlimited usage since they introduced that tier (if you are a heavy search user, I'd agree the $5/tier "limited" tier doesn't make so much sense). It takes a bit more clicking, but I found 6mo usage view https://kagi.com/settings?p=consumption&range=1 and its nice to check on it after having "lived with it" a while. My lowest months are 500 searches, and a few higher, but one month goes up to 1300 searches. The "killer app", and what made me subscribe when I started was being able to up/down-rank site results myself. Being able to just not see content farms is the starkest difference now vs when I use Google Search (it's striking and seems to make search downright useless).

I've used 0 "AI Tokens" for the entire period. (I've never found much use for their FastGPT or Universal summarizer, but I am already a heavy Claude, ChatGPT, and w/ Gemini 2.0 models, AI Studio user now). I was also subscribed to Perplexity Pro at a $10/mo introductory rate this past year, and while I enjoyed it when I used it, I found its utility somewhat situational and didn't renew at $200/y - I use Claude, ChatGPT, and AI Studio now w/ the Gemini 2.0 models extensively, and when I want search result analysis, I think both of the latter now fill that niche pretty well. I just saw thanks to this thread that Kagi's "Ultimate" tier has access to their new "Assistant" product, which looks pretty well thought out, so I'll be giving it a spin (they should probably give like once a day trial access or something if they're looking to grow it, most people probably wouldn't put down $25 sight unseen): https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/assistant.html

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#45
post #2

Kagi is a tough pill to swallow. Their search is hands down the best around, there's no other way around it. That being said, $10/mo is also expensive. The workaround I found is using Kagi Ultimate. I get access to Claude (and I'm still able to attach files + access a dozen other LLMs) for $25/mo, so I was able to cancel Claude and keep Kagi and get the best of both worlds from either product. Side note: incredible t…

Can't say I understand how $10/month is expensive. Quality search results ultimately save time digging through poor quality search results. Add up 300+ searches per month and surely you're hitting minimum wage value at least. The value proposition is absolutely there at $10.

Less than half of HN users are from the US and wages are lower in most countries, sometimes by a lot. Less than 10% in Turkey or Ukraine for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average_w...

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#46

I'd pay $10 in a heartbeat if Kagi reliably used all my search keywords. But they don't, and I don't understand it. Just use all my words except stop words. I took the trouble to type them in. I don't care if your coverage isn't as good as Google in its heyday. "0 search results" should be a mark of pride now.

I find it interesting that another comment states that they love Kagi exactly because Kagi uses all their search terms as opposed to Google. Not doubting your experience here, but I wonder how those experiences can differ so much.

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#47
Long time Kagi subscriber here.

I think their focus should be to reduce resource usage on their side and make servers cheaper to run. Not other shenanigans like t-shirt or FastGPT or whatever. They can then offer a more attractive price for general public, who has never paid for search before and gets caught in the headlights when they hear you pay. Because right now, they don’t even have 40k users and if it goes on with this tempo, while also burning their resources for AI-things, I am afraid they will not stay much longer. Don‘t get me wrong, I am okay with the 10$ I pay, but, come on… who needs a t-shirt of a search engine and two different AI-thingy?!

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#49

Long time Kagi subscriber here. I think their focus should be to reduce resource usage on their side and make servers cheaper to run. Not other shenanigans like t-shirt or FastGPT or whatever. They can then offer a more attractive price for general public, who has never paid for search before and gets caught in the headlights when they hear you pay. Because right now, they don’t even have 40k users and if it goes on…

> I think their focus should be to reduce resource usage on their side and make servers cheaper to run.

I'd like for them to expose their result cache. Lately I've hit a run of pages that have updated my result away. I have a result-blurb with the search result; I could use what comes before and after it.

Re: A three month review of kagi search and the orion web browser (2024)

#50

I'd pay $10 in a heartbeat if Kagi reliably used all my search keywords. But they don't, and I don't understand it. Just use all my words except stop words. I took the trouble to type them in. I don't care if your coverage isn't as good as Google in its heyday. "0 search results" should be a mark of pride now.

It’s highly annoying to me as well. I’m still paying for now, but since they started (I was using them in Beta), they’ve been slowly using towards the mainstream "implicit" behavior and away from "explicit" behavior. I now see myself quoting terms far more often, which has other disadvantages (no typo correction, diacritics becoming relevant, etc.).

It’s the same for regional searches. Used to be (until Dec 2023) I could search for an ambiguous term (e.g. a product name that’s the same in English and German) with "!de" for German regional search and get German results. Now that’s impossible as most results will be the same English pages I’d get with my normal international or US region.

Overall just not a fan of the direction they are moving in (which seems to be DDG with personalization and no ads, but no more expert search)

Post reply on HN