Live data from Hacker News

Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

plasticlist.org

41–50 of 212 posts

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#41
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why did you ever drink it in the first place? A boba is 500g of diabetes packaged in 100g of trash. It's the worst idea ever.

Boba can be part of a healthy diet and lifestyle.

Jesus HN, it's a sweet drink. Y'all act like nobody eats cookies, candy, ice cream. Happy Birthday here's your kale salad.

The "ate like shit your whole life and are now overcorrecting in your 40s because you got consequences for the first time" energy is big in this thread.

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#43
One thing I'd like to see tested: I have a theory that reusable plastic containers leach out most of their chemicals early in their life, so the amount imparted to any food diminishes with each use. Under this theory, I save and reuse old plastic containers for a long time, and avoid new ones (especially single use). Could this be true, or misguided?

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it can't. Type 2 diabetes is mostly genetic. I can eat as much Boba as I want and not get diabetes.

Source on type 2 being mostly genetic? All I've found is there is some link but not conclusive. Also T2 is on the rise in young people. Have their genetics changed dramatically in the past few decades? Or has food? https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data-research/research/young-pe...

So interestingly it could be the two working together [1] [2]. T2 may be on the rise partially to epigenetic changes.

[1] https://www.thediabetescouncil.com/link-epigenetics-type-2-d...

[2] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10258626/

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#46

One thing I'd like to see tested: I have a theory that reusable plastic containers leach out most of their chemicals early in their life, so the amount imparted to any food diminishes with each use. Under this theory, I save and reuse old plastic containers for a long time, and avoid new ones (especially single use). Could this be true, or misguided?

I don't have any sources handy but I believe conventional wisdom is that plastic decomposition accelerates with age due to the cumulative effect of UV exposure.

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#47
post #36

Looking forward to more testing like this. I've been trying to consciously avoid anything combining "hot" with "plastic" though there's only so much you can do. Fish are aggregators of this stuff so that's not surprising. Spam and other processed meats and prepared foods also not too surprising (though what's with the Annie's organic mac and cheese being so full of it? Maybe it's the sauce?)... I think the tap water…

Also, is there an aggregate plastic danger metric? It would be great to develop an aggregate metric that combines the different types of plastics and multiplies them by their known potential dangers to the human body. I realize the multiples will change over time as more research comes in, but right now, there's no way to quantify BPA vs DEHP dangers. This would make the main giant aggregate list: https://www.plastic…

The PlasticList site explores safety levels, including a discussion of aggregate levels across products and chemicals. It’s an interesting but frustrating read.

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#48

One thing I'd like to see tested: I have a theory that reusable plastic containers leach out most of their chemicals early in their life, so the amount imparted to any food diminishes with each use. Under this theory, I save and reuse old plastic containers for a long time, and avoid new ones (especially single use). Could this be true, or misguided?

I'd expect almost the opposite. Plastics left in the sun tend to turn brittle, I'd expect that to be a big contributor to microplastics generally in the environment as those plastics break down.

But I agree, would be interesting to know.

I've been switching my stuff over to glass when possible. But, unfortunately unless I become a full-time farmer there's no escaping the fact that my food comes wrapped in plastic that's wrapped in plastic and further wrapped in more plastic. Single use plastics for food should be heavily restricted.

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#49

Am I interpreting this correctly that Brita actually works as a limiter for plasticizers in tap water? Specially since tap water plasticizer content can vary by a lot?

The study makes clear the water findings are inconclusive.

Re: Plasticlist Report – Data on plastic chemicals in Bay Area foods

#50

One thing I'd like to see tested: I have a theory that reusable plastic containers leach out most of their chemicals early in their life, so the amount imparted to any food diminishes with each use. Under this theory, I save and reuse old plastic containers for a long time, and avoid new ones (especially single use). Could this be true, or misguided?

Not exactly food containers, but apparently, textiles release most of their microplastics after the first few washes [1]. So, the longer you wear a tshirt, the safer it becomes.

[1]: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/microplastics-from-te...

Post reply on HN