> When was the last time you felt your smartphone really couldn’t cope? Every day since a couple years now. > I struggle to recall the last time an app jerked and juddered into life. I don’t. But here’s the thing: it wasn’t that way at first. It’s just that over time my phone just slowed down. Purging it of its data and unused software did nothing, I just had less and less available memory over time, and maps grew sl…
This has not been my experience, and I suspect an unusual situation on your part.
Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
41–50 of 430 posts
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#42Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#43https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/motorola-atrix-4g-att
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2011/03/motorola-atrix-the-u...
This was precisely the target of the Motorola Atrix. They sold a netbook-like "shell" with a monitor and keyboard, and when you plugged the Atrix smartphone in it became an Ubuntu webtop device.
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#44This and also I don't want a tumor on the back of my phone. Can we go back to flat bodies at the expense of camera quality? For some of us phone cameras are really not _that_ important.
Alternatively, I'll take a thick lens, flush in a thick case, which might then make space for a thicker battery
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't remember what the project was called, but many years ago I remember seeing a concept for a Linux phone that also doubled as your desktop when plugged into a hub.
All Samsung Galaxy phones have a built in desktop OS called Dex. I remember plugging my monitor usb-c cable to charge my phone and being blown away when a desktop UI appeared on the monitor
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#46This and also I don't want a tumor on the back of my phone. Can we go back to flat bodies at the expense of camera quality? For some of us phone cameras are really not _that_ important.
I agree the lens bulges are a pain in the arse, but I want a good camera.
You can buy low-end phones with minimal bump from the likes of Motorola and Nokia if cameras are not important to you. But I want my higher-end (not necessarily premium, but in that direction) phones to keep coming with better and better cameras please, and if that means a bit of a bulge then fine.
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#47Better performance can also improve battery life.
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
A better camera is the only reason to buy a new phone. If you don't want that, you can just buy a 5 year old or more phone and be just as happier.
What about security updates?
Most of the world is not using the latest version of Android, and you don't really hear about viruses/malware like we used to with Windows machines in the '90s and '00s.
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#49With USB-C, surely we are at the point where we can plug our phones into a hub with a couple of monitors attached and get a proper desktop environment?
I can't remember what the project was called, but many years ago I remember seeing a concept for a Linux phone that also doubled as your desktop when plugged into a hub.
Re: Unless my phone can be a PC, I don't want to keep paying for extra performance
#50With USB-C, surely we are at the point where we can plug our phones into a hub with a couple of monitors attached and get a proper desktop environment?
And yet, this question is here - somehow no one really uses it or even knows about it.