Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

This website is hosted on Bluesky

danielmangum.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 184 posts

Re: This website is hosted on Bluesky

#41

Post by johncolanduoni »

nightpool wrote: post #30
simonw wrote: post #3

I was curious as to the security context this runs in: curl -i 'https://porcini.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:j22nebhg6aek3kt2mex5ng7e&cid=bafkreic5fmelmhqoqxfjz2siw5ey43ixwlzg5gvv2pkkz7o25ikepv4zeq' Here are the headers I got back: x-powered-by: Express access-control-allow-origin: * cache-control: private vary: Authorization, Accept-Encoding ratelimit-limit: 3000 ratelimit-rema…

is the default-src necessary if you're using sandbox or is it redundant?

`sandbox` doesn’t affect making requests via HTML (images, stylesheets, etc.).

Re: This website is hosted on Bluesky

#43

Post by echelon »

leoc wrote: post #13

https://bsky.app/profile/leocomerford.bsky.social/post/3l7v6... To help the hard of clicking, this time I have pasted it all for you: Leo R. Comerford ‪@leocomerford.bsky.social‬ Why was it decided not to build on any existing content-addressable networking system (IPFS or whatever)? November 1, 2024 at 12:39 PM ‪Leo R. Comerford‬ ‪@leocomerford.bsky.social‬ · 23d (Not implying that this was the wrong decision, it’s…

"skeet" is such a terrible term for this. It's like mastodon "toot"s.

Using bodily functions as core infra terminology is off-putting and feels like a bit like a juvenile boy's club. I get that some people find it funny, but it alienates people. We should just call these "posts".

Same thing with names like CockroachDB and GIMP.

Re: This website is hosted on Bluesky

#44

Post by xeeeeeeeeeeenu »

echelon wrote: post #43
leoc wrote: post #13

https://bsky.app/profile/leocomerford.bsky.social/post/3l7v6... To help the hard of clicking, this time I have pasted it all for you: Leo R. Comerford ‪@leocomerford.bsky.social‬ Why was it decided not to build on any existing content-addressable networking system (IPFS or whatever)? November 1, 2024 at 12:39 PM ‪Leo R. Comerford‬ ‪@leocomerford.bsky.social‬ · 23d (Not implying that this was the wrong decision, it’s…

"skeet" is such a terrible term for this. It's like mastodon "toot"s. Using bodily functions as core infra terminology is off-putting and feels like a bit like a juvenile boy's club. I get that some people find it funny, but it alienates people. We should just call these "posts". Same thing with names like CockroachDB and GIMP.

The official Bluesky FAQ says this:

>What is a post on Bluesky called?

>The official term is “post.”

https://bsky.social/about/blog/5-19-2023-user-faq

Re: This website is hosted on Bluesky

#45

Post by SAHChandler »

I'm very hopeful for the possibility of using bluesky for blob data.

A friend and I had considered looking into storing DOOM WADs on bluesky so that "map packs" could be shared in the same way posts are. Follow an account, a list, or a starter pack, and you could theoretically modify GZDoom or some other client to know how to search and view any WADs posted by those accounts. Like how the Steam Workshop works, except it's via bluesky. :D

Re: This website is hosted on Bluesky

#47

Post by extraduder_ire »

benatkin wrote: post #34
remram wrote: post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see how. This is a direct link to the author's bluesky server (PDS) so of course it is controlled by them.

Lack of moderation combined with an offical-sounding domain name. This would have to get the user to follow a link or call a phone number or something though. These are plausible. It's too bad the content-security-policy can't prevent following links.

Bluesky seems to use a lot of totally different domain names for each part of their infrastructure, maybe for this reason. e.g. this one is bsky.network

While they're nowhere close on volume, they're certainly beating microsoft in terms of the rate they're adding similar looking official URLs.

Re: This website is hosted on Bluesky

#49

Post by leoc »

echelon wrote: post #43
leoc wrote: post #13

https://bsky.app/profile/leocomerford.bsky.social/post/3l7v6... To help the hard of clicking, this time I have pasted it all for you: Leo R. Comerford ‪@leocomerford.bsky.social‬ Why was it decided not to build on any existing content-addressable networking system (IPFS or whatever)? November 1, 2024 at 12:39 PM ‪Leo R. Comerford‬ ‪@leocomerford.bsky.social‬ · 23d (Not implying that this was the wrong decision, it’s…

"skeet" is such a terrible term for this. It's like mastodon "toot"s. Using bodily functions as core infra terminology is off-putting and feels like a bit like a juvenile boy's club. I get that some people find it funny, but it alienates people. We should just call these "posts". Same thing with names like CockroachDB and GIMP.

Sure, whatever: I had certainly given it approximately no thought in this case, and my personal investment in 'sk**t' is zero. I'd edit my post but I seem to have hit the timeout. I will also say that I don't think this is the most interesting or on-topic thread to pull on from my comment.

Re: This website is hosted on Bluesky

#50

Post by [deleted] »

extraduder_ire wrote: post #47
benatkin wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lack of moderation combined with an offical-sounding domain name. This would have to get the user to follow a link or call a phone number or something though. These are plausible. It's too bad the content-security-policy can't prevent following links.

Bluesky seems to use a lot of totally different domain names for each part of their infrastructure, maybe for this reason. e.g. this one is bsky.network While they're nowhere close on volume, they're certainly beating microsoft in terms of the rate they're adding similar looking official URLs.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN