Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24080135/avast-security-p... I think you can find more stuff like this through your own digging.
Not what I'd consider a trojan, but I agree that it's bad - so alright, point taken. (In my dictionary, trojan allows remote control. Maybe I'm just old.)
Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
41–50 of 66 posts
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#42Ah, this is an ((LLM vulnerability) scanner) not (LLM (vulnerability scanner)) which I thought would be a terrible idea and couldn't understand why everyone was joking about the lies. I also am not a Trekkie, so I had to look up all the tailor references but the character's philosophy makes sense for the name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elim_Garak#:~:text=the%20truth...
Thank you for clarifying. I also initially thought it was an (LLM (vulnerability scanner)).
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but this megacorporation is not a resistance fighter. It's not even as human as the cardassians.
I get that making GPUs isn't the most environmentally friendly, but the Cardassians literally conqured the homrworld of the Bajorans and enslaved them and strip mined their planet for fifty years. Whatever crimes you think Nvidia is guilty of, they have, at most, one planet they've done things to.
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get that making GPUs isn't the most environmentally friendly, but the Cardassians literally conqured the homrworld of the Bajorans and enslaved them and strip mined their planet for fifty years. Whatever crimes you think Nvidia is guilty of, they have, at most, one planet they've done things to.
You probably misposted, this doesn't seem to have anything to do with what I wrote above.
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24080135/avast-security-p... I think you can find more stuff like this through your own digging.
Not what I'd consider a trojan, but I agree that it's bad - so alright, point taken. (In my dictionary, trojan allows remote control. Maybe I'm just old.)
Did the Crowdstrike thing earlier this year reach you? They sell a corporate version of this kind of trojan, and did a fuckup in an update, suddenly making a lot of people realise that someone else has control over their computers.
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
You probably misposted, this doesn't seem to have anything to do with what I wrote above.
You wrote that Nvidia is inhuman, and that the Cardassians are more human that it, but the Cardassians commited horrible warcrimes while Nvidia, as far as I know, has not.
I'm sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about. Yes, I pointed out that corporations aren't human, for example lacking in things like having a body.
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I guess I was a bit direct but I don't fully understand the down vote. I was not implying that the README was bad and it does have corrections that would improve it. My reason for not raising a PR is some repo owners don't care and I really didn't want to go through the effort unless they actually care.
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I guess I was a bit direct but I don't fully understand the down vote. I was not implying that the README was bad and it does have corrections that would improve it. My reason for not raising a PR is some repo owners don't care and I really didn't want to go through the effort unless they actually care.
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#49Garak is a former spook that served an explicitly genocidal fascist regime and repeatedly tries to get back in and moonlights as a terrorist and starts a war. It's a borderline insane branding of this corporate tool. Words and stories apparently mean nothing to these people, so if allowed they'll probably destroy the lot of it for all of us.
I am sure the bajorans among us are appalled
Re: Garak, LLM Vulnerability Scanner
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/22/24080135/avast-security-p... I think you can find more stuff like this through your own digging.
Not what I'd consider a trojan, but I agree that it's bad - so alright, point taken. (In my dictionary, trojan allows remote control. Maybe I'm just old.)
Edit: that came out way more condescending than I intentended