Pulumi is really a royal piece of shit. Why the f*ck am I writing code to do "deployment". In C# --> new Dictionary when dealing with a values.yaml for instance. The whole need to figure out when and when not to use Apply. Give me Terraform (as much as I hate it) any day.
Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
41–50 of 172 posts
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#42Digital Ocean isn't really a "real" cloud. Maybe use Digital Ocean if you're hosting video game servers, but no serious business should be on it.
I won't touch DO after they took my droplet offline for 3 hours because I got DDoS'd by someone that was upset that I banned them from an IRC channel for spamming N-bombs and other racial slurs.
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#43Pulumi is really a royal piece of shit. Why the f*ck am I writing code to do "deployment". In C# --> new Dictionary when dealing with a values.yaml for instance. The whole need to figure out when and when not to use Apply. Give me Terraform (as much as I hate it) any day.
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#44I don’t think Digital Ocean is all that much better for pricing, but using Pulumi over CDK is a pure win as far as I’m concerned.
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#45I wish CDK was fully baked enough to actually use. It's still missing coverage for some AWS services (sometimes you have to do things in cloudformation, which sucks) and integrating existing infra doesn't work consistently. Oh and it creates cloudformation stacks behind the scenes and makes for troubleshooting hell.
The biggest hurdle I've encountered is cross-stack resource sharing, especially in case of bidirectional dependencies like KMS keys and IAM roles.
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#46Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#47Digital Ocean isn't really a "real" cloud. Maybe use Digital Ocean if you're hosting video game servers, but no serious business should be on it.
And can you name a real cloud that charges a half-reasonable price for bandwidth? I consider $10/TB to be half-reasonable.
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#48I wish CDK was fully baked enough to actually use. It's still missing coverage for some AWS services (sometimes you have to do things in cloudformation, which sucks) and integrating existing infra doesn't work consistently. Oh and it creates cloudformation stacks behind the scenes and makes for troubleshooting hell.
So dumb. Trying to move to SST for only that reason
but if you add cdk to the path, you can still deploy, its just that your cicd and deployment scripts are not all using bun anymore
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#49It’s only “insane costs” if you don’t know what you’re doing.
on one hand, I can see how this is an unfalsifiable standard, on the other hand I can see the utility of solving a friction for people that messed up
Re: Forget CDK and AWS's insane costs. Pulumi and DigitalOcean to the rescue
#50I wish CDK was fully baked enough to actually use. It's still missing coverage for some AWS services (sometimes you have to do things in cloudformation, which sucks) and integrating existing infra doesn't work consistently. Oh and it creates cloudformation stacks behind the scenes and makes for troubleshooting hell.