Live data from Hacker News

The Crisis in String Theory Is Worse Than You Think

math.columbia.edu

41–42 of 42 posts

Re: The Crisis in String Theory Is Worse Than You Think

#41
post #16

I can't speak to the merits (or lack thereof) of string theory. That's well beyond my physics knowledge. It must however be daunting to be a theoretical physicist right now. It seems like the field has been in a standstill for years. The advances in the 20th century were just eye-watering. The Standard Model is a mixed bag of stunningly accurate prediction (eg electron monopole moment [1]) vs the wildly inaccurate (e…

The second link reignited my bias for Zeldovich as not having sufficient public recognition. I previously knew him as the originator of the idea of Hawking radiation (he predicted it around Kerr black holes, and told Hawking about that), but it looks like he also had major contributions to both the Soviet nuclear project and the vacuum energy problem (as you say still unsolved).

Re: The Crisis in String Theory Is Worse Than You Think

#42
post #40

I'm beginning to like Sabine more and more. She is pro-nuclear, but she's not afraid to criticize the issues, like she did recently with small nuclear reactors. The most optimistic view I've heard on string theory is that the Ads/CFT correspondence actually can move to de-sitter space one day. String theory proponents actually believe this. They do believe the Ads/CFT correspondence is one of the crowning achievement…

Sabine wasn’t mentioned in this article at all. Why is this the top comment?

But as a side note, Sabine has the annoying habit of speaking authoritatively in matters outside her expertise (i.e. physics) in her YouTube videos. You catch someone doing that once in a scripted presentation, in a subject area where you have expertise and you know they are being superficial at best and wrong at worst, and you basically tune out.

Post reply on HN