Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a DOSbox story as well. A customer requested an emergency change to some firmware that was built for an old 8051-based platform. We had a single instance of the compiler from [redacted] available on a PC that was left in a closet for a decade or so. The compiler maker was still in business but wanted 15 years of extortion-level "retroactive support" payments to let us move the license to a newer machine, and I…
Good for an emergency, but I'd make sure to calmly move to an open 8051 compiler. Because screw that awful vendor.
Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support
#41Porting was the backup plan but time was of the essence, so the hack worked. Validation of brand new object code would have been a huge pain. But yeah, I would Assume that Renewing the license would have killed the project.