Live data from Hacker News

DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

github.com

41–44 of 44 posts

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#41
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a DOSbox story as well. A customer requested an emergency change to some firmware that was built for an old 8051-based platform. We had a single instance of the compiler from [redacted] available on a PC that was left in a closet for a decade or so. The compiler maker was still in business but wanted 15 years of extortion-level "retroactive support" payments to let us move the license to a newer machine, and I…

Good for an emergency, but I'd make sure to calmly move to an open 8051 compiler. Because screw that awful vendor.

Porting was the backup plan but time was of the essence, so the hack worked. Validation of brand new object code would have been a huge pain. But yeah, I would Assume that Renewing the license would have killed the project.

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#42
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also PCem, which is has a faster dynamic recompiler and supports a few more hardware configs afaik. But hasn't been updated in a couple of years. There's also UniPCem, which I think is a fork/port of PCem, and more recently updated. But I haven't tried it.

86box is itself a fork of PCem.

I use that myself to rekindle my love affair with the Amstrad PC1512, with some enhancements, 128KB ram expansion, and a pair of 32MB hard disks.

Re: DOSBox-X: Enhanced Fork of DOSBox for Expanded DOS and Retro PC Support

#43
post #32

Whenever I see a DOS thread, I like to remind people of eXoDOS, one of the most impressive archival efforts of every DOS game ever. Complete with manual scans, extras, and all neatly sorted in a launcher.

FTwebsite: "Get the Full Release via Torrent (638GB)" Ouch!

other weird thing about exoDOS is you don't download and run. there's a huge decompression process that takes at least a few hours and generates 999 gorillion files. use on disk would be more than 638 GB consequent to the decompress-and-create-a-gorilloin-files process. Then again what you can do, this is arguably smarter than just torrent out a gorillion tiny files
Post reply on HN